2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2012.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physico-chemical characterization of biochars from vacuum pyrolysis of South African agricultural wastes for application as soil amendments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
32
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
8
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar increases in K and Na content in biochar have been observed by Xu et al (2013); Smider and singh (2014); Stella Mary et al (2016). As reported by Uras et al (2012); Smider and Singh (2014), the excessive addition of Ca to soil could hinder the use of Mg and K except if it is added to soils suffering from Ca deficiency. Thus, argan biochar which contains low content of Ca can be worth considering as a soil amendment.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar increases in K and Na content in biochar have been observed by Xu et al (2013); Smider and singh (2014); Stella Mary et al (2016). As reported by Uras et al (2012); Smider and Singh (2014), the excessive addition of Ca to soil could hinder the use of Mg and K except if it is added to soils suffering from Ca deficiency. Thus, argan biochar which contains low content of Ca can be worth considering as a soil amendment.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The presence of salts and alkaline cations in the biochar are responsible for the highly pH and EC values. Because of the higher relative solubility of K containing salts and carbonates in water, the K contents of the biochars can have an effect on EC values (Uras et al 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher amount of inorganics in biomass led to formation of char having low surface area due to the filling up pores by fusion of molten ash [28]. Similarly, due to the lower ash content, black wattle biochar showed higher surface area (241 g/m 2 ) than vineyard (92 g/m 2 ) [29]. Guerrero et al also observed that chars from rice husk devolatilization have lower surface areas compared with those from eucalyptus obtained under similar conditions [30].…”
Section: Char Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For KH2PO4, BC II and peat showed the higher value. Biochar, as reported by Coates, 2000, contain little or no NO3−, which is an essential nutrient for plant growth while the PO43-was characteristic for each feedstock (Uras et al, 2012). Given the high nutrient content of the three biochars, a significant positive effect on plant growth especially in the sandy soil was expected.…”
Section: Soil Peat and Biochar Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 73%