2013
DOI: 10.4236/fns.2013.49a2010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physico-Chemical Properties of Milk Whey Protein Agglomerates for Use in Oral Nutritional Therapy

Abstract: Agglomerates based on milk whey proteins and modified starch (MS) were developed for patients with dysphagia. Calcium caseinate (CaCas), whey protein isolate (WPI), concentrate (WPC) and hydrolysate (WPH) were used. The sources were agglomerated with the MS and an increase in the porosity and viscosity of the agglomerates were observed. In all the systems evaluated, the WPI agglomerate at a concentration of 112 g/L showed a viscosity between 2122 and 5110 cP, and the agglomerates of WPC and WPH between 1115-28… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Amiza et al (2013) reported that the WHC of silver catfish frame hydrolysate at DH 43% was significantly lower compared to those of DH 55% and DH 68%. However, WHC of non-hydrolysed EBN samples obtained in this study was similar to that of egg-white protein hydrolysate (17.28 mL/g), while hydrolysed EBN samples showed comparable WHC to egg-yolk protein hydrolysate (5.12 mL/g) (Pokora et al, 2013), whey protein concentrate (3.77 mL/g) and calcium caseinate (6.11 mL/g) (Carvalho-Silva et al, 2013). Nevertheless, WHC of EBN samples in this study was much higher than those reported for whey protein isolate and hydrolysate (1.82 mL/g and 2.63 mL/g, respectively) (Carvalho-Silva et al, 2013) and fish protein hydrolysates (Wasswa et al, 2007).…”
Section: Water Holding Capacity (Whc)supporting
confidence: 49%
“…However, Amiza et al (2013) reported that the WHC of silver catfish frame hydrolysate at DH 43% was significantly lower compared to those of DH 55% and DH 68%. However, WHC of non-hydrolysed EBN samples obtained in this study was similar to that of egg-white protein hydrolysate (17.28 mL/g), while hydrolysed EBN samples showed comparable WHC to egg-yolk protein hydrolysate (5.12 mL/g) (Pokora et al, 2013), whey protein concentrate (3.77 mL/g) and calcium caseinate (6.11 mL/g) (Carvalho-Silva et al, 2013). Nevertheless, WHC of EBN samples in this study was much higher than those reported for whey protein isolate and hydrolysate (1.82 mL/g and 2.63 mL/g, respectively) (Carvalho-Silva et al, 2013) and fish protein hydrolysates (Wasswa et al, 2007).…”
Section: Water Holding Capacity (Whc)supporting
confidence: 49%
“…It was found that smaller droplet size ( d 32 ) can be created at the low viscosity ratio as this could allow more efficient transmission of shear stress to the droplets (Hall and others ). The viscosity of 15% and 30% WPI solutions are 100 and 150 cp, respectively (Carvalho‐Silva and others ). Therefore, it can be concluded that the 30% WPI emulsion had smaller droplets than the 15% emulsion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Protein solubility is typically at a minimum when the pH of its surrounding environment reaches the isoelectric point of that protein or the pH at which the net charge of the protein is zero. Isoelectric points are unique to specific, isolated proteins, and it is critical to note that the protein isolates from this study comprise more than one protein ( Figure 1 B), but present literature estimates isoelectric points of 4.5–4.8 for pea proteins, 5.5–6.4 for hemp proteins and 4.5–5.2 for whey protein [ 46 , 51 , 52 , 53 ]. Based on these values, the increases in turbidity observed for pea and hemp proteins in the absence of polyphenol-containing blueberry powder can be attributed to pH-induced changes in solubility.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%