1999
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.1999.tb00396.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physico-chemistry of initial microbial adhesive interactions – its mechanisms and methods for study

Abstract: In this review, initial microbial adhesive interactions are divided into adhesion to substratum surfaces, coaggregation between microbial pairs and co-adhesion between sessile and planktonic microorganisms of different strains or species. The physico-chemical mechanisms underlying the adhesive interactions are described and a critical review is given of currently employed methods to study microbial adhesive interactions, with an emphasis on the use of the parallel plate flow chamber. Subsequently, for each of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
342
1
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 826 publications
(355 citation statements)
references
References 252 publications
(330 reference statements)
9
342
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Shown are means and standard deviations of Ra (n=10 for tooth slides, n=5 for dental materials), and for CA mean and quality of fit (=linear equation to experimental dataset) a material like surface free energy, hydrophobicity, and surface roughness, as well as material composition, affect initial bacterial adhesion [13][14][15] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Shown are means and standard deviations of Ra (n=10 for tooth slides, n=5 for dental materials), and for CA mean and quality of fit (=linear equation to experimental dataset) a material like surface free energy, hydrophobicity, and surface roughness, as well as material composition, affect initial bacterial adhesion [13][14][15] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They further showed that the influence of surface roughness was stronger than that of surface free energy and surface hydrophobicity. Generally, rough surfaces promote bacterial adhesion whereas smooth surfaces minimize it [13][14][15] . According to Bollen et al 16) , surface roughness below Ra=0.2 m had no further quantitative and qualitative effects on bacterial adhesion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted, however, that these theories should be applied with caution; for example, bacterial cell properties can change due to a change in EPS expression, consequently affecting their adhesion [22]. Furthermore, the presence of bacterial appendages, even negatively charged ones, can pierce the electrostatic energy barrier between the negatively charged surface of the bacteria and the negative charge of the adhering surface [23]. Finally, the presence of organic matter and other solutes in real water will foul the membrane by forming a cake layer on the membrane surface which will change with time and affect the adhesion of bacteria [24], adding substantial complexity to the system.…”
Section: Bacterial Adhesion: General Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polymer brushes increase the distance between microorganisms and a substratum surface by entropic effects, therewith reducing the attractive forces between surface and the microorganisms. [10][11][12] As a result, reductions in microbial adhesion by 2 orders of magnitude have been reported 13 for different strains and species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%