2015
DOI: 10.1007/s13197-015-1821-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physicochemical, bioactive and functional evaluation of the exotic fruits Opuntia ficus-indica AND Pilosocereus pachycladus Ritter from the Brazilian caatinga

Abstract: The Brazilian caatinga is characterized as one of the most populated and biologically diverse semi-arid regions in the world. Two exotic fruits collected in this unique bioma, the prickly pear (Opuntia ficus-indica) and facheiro (Philosocereus pachycladus Ritter), were investigated in regard to their physicochemical, bioactive and functional characteristics. Four different extracts were prepared and investigated: water (W), ethanol/ water 70:100 (E70), ethanol/water 80:100 (E80), and ethanol only (E100). The b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…TSS for Vigor and Mandarina prickly pears varieties were acceptable considering this range, and similar to those reported in other varieties of O. ficus‐indica (10.7–15.7%) from Alicante, Spain (Andreu et al., 2018). pH, TA, and moisture in pulp of Vigor and Mandarina prickly pears varieties were also similar of those reported in prickly pear varieties from Spain and Brazil, with pH values ranging from 5.41 to 6.15, TA between 0.022% and 0.07%, and a moisture content ranging from 79.0% to 84.4% (Andreu et al., 2018; de Souza et al., 2015; Fernández‐López et al., 2018). It is noteworthy that TSS in Mandarina prickly pear variety was significantly higher (by 20%) whereas TA was significantly lower (by 25%) than those in Vigor prickly pear variety, which in turn was reflected in a higher TSS/TA ratio (by 60%) in Mandarina compared to Vigor .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…TSS for Vigor and Mandarina prickly pears varieties were acceptable considering this range, and similar to those reported in other varieties of O. ficus‐indica (10.7–15.7%) from Alicante, Spain (Andreu et al., 2018). pH, TA, and moisture in pulp of Vigor and Mandarina prickly pears varieties were also similar of those reported in prickly pear varieties from Spain and Brazil, with pH values ranging from 5.41 to 6.15, TA between 0.022% and 0.07%, and a moisture content ranging from 79.0% to 84.4% (Andreu et al., 2018; de Souza et al., 2015; Fernández‐López et al., 2018). It is noteworthy that TSS in Mandarina prickly pear variety was significantly higher (by 20%) whereas TA was significantly lower (by 25%) than those in Vigor prickly pear variety, which in turn was reflected in a higher TSS/TA ratio (by 60%) in Mandarina compared to Vigor .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Despite the higher α ‐glucosidase inhibition activity in pulp than in peel extracts, the whole fruit extracts presented the highest α ‐glucosidase inhibiting activity due to the synergic action of compounds found in each tissue. Higher α ‐amylase and α ‐glucosidase values have been reported in O. ficus‐indica fruit methanolic and water extracts with 50.7% and 70.7% α ‐amylase and α ‐glucosidase inhibition in 70% ethanol extracts, respectively …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Higher -amylase and -glucosidase values have been reported in O. ficus-indica fruit methanolic and water extracts with 50.7% and 70.7% -amylase and -glucosidase inhibition in 70% ethanol extracts, respectively. 33 IG2 presented acceptable enzymatic association ( Fig. 4(c) and (d)) with 13% and 42% -amylase and -glucosidase inhibiting activity, respectively.…”
Section: Antihyperglycemic Activitymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Many native species provide fruits with unique sensory characteristics, high concentrations of nutrients and exotic characteristics, which progressively increases their consumption in the domestic and international market (Alves et al, 2008;Rufino et al, 2010;Cardoso et al, 2011). Brazilian native fruits have been subjected to many studies around the world and have attracted great interest of the scientific community (Mattietto et al, 2010;Almeida et al, 2011;Dembitsky et al, 2011;Cardoso et al, 2011;Souza et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%