2017
DOI: 10.1080/17597269.2017.1368058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physicochemical characteristics and pyrolysis kinetics of raw and torrefied hybrid poplar wood  (NM6 – Populus nigra)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although activation energy of hydrochar pyrolysis reaction increases with conversion degree (see in Figure ), average activation energy is lower than the average activation energy of wood sawdust pyrolysis. Similar results were observed by Regmi et al, where torrefied (dry torrefaction) hybrid poplar had lower average activation energy (168.20 [calculated by KAS method] and 169.51 kJ/mol [calculated by FWO method]) than average activation energy of raw hybrid poplar (202.27 kJ/mol [calculated by KAS method] and 201.69 kJ/mol [calculated by FWO method]). The difference between the activation energies can be explained by referring the wood structure, which is changed during the hydrothermal carbonization (Figure ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although activation energy of hydrochar pyrolysis reaction increases with conversion degree (see in Figure ), average activation energy is lower than the average activation energy of wood sawdust pyrolysis. Similar results were observed by Regmi et al, where torrefied (dry torrefaction) hybrid poplar had lower average activation energy (168.20 [calculated by KAS method] and 169.51 kJ/mol [calculated by FWO method]) than average activation energy of raw hybrid poplar (202.27 kJ/mol [calculated by KAS method] and 201.69 kJ/mol [calculated by FWO method]). The difference between the activation energies can be explained by referring the wood structure, which is changed during the hydrothermal carbonization (Figure ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Activation energies regarding pyrolysis of wood sawdust and its Although activation energy of hydrochar pyrolysis reaction increases with conversion degree (see in Figure 7), average activation energy is lower than the average activation energy of wood sawdust pyrolysis. Similar results were observed by Regmi et al, 47 where torrefied (dry torrefaction) hybrid poplar had lower average activation . The difference between the activation energies can be explained by referring the wood structure, which is changed during the hydrothermal carbonization (Figure 1).…”
Section: Kineticssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The new absorption peak at 1268 cm −1 is the stretching vibration of phenolic C-OH in peanut hull [41]. Notably, phenolic hydroxyl groups in lignin, benzene ring, and peanut hull mainly participate in coordination reactions [45].…”
Section: Fourier Infrared Spectroscopy (Ftir) Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 107 ] Regmi et al studied the impact of torrefaction in upstream processing for fast pyrolysis using reaction models and reported a 10% reduction in the activation energy of reactions compared to untreated feedstock. [ 108 ]…”
Section: Thermochemical Conversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[107] Regmi et al studied the impact of torrefaction in upstream processing for fast pyrolysis using reaction models and reported a 10% reduction in the activation energy of reactions compared to untreated feedstock. [108] The development of small-scale mobile pyrolysis facilities and the co-pyrolysis of different feedstocks are two emerging trends in pyrolysis process research. [100][101][102] Small-scale mobile pyrolysis facilities are gaining prominence in the biorefinery supply chain as they can Zacher et al [88] Whole tree chips, forest residues, and agricultural residues Bio-oil Hydrogenation-derived renewable diesel (HDRD)…”
Section: Pyrolysismentioning
confidence: 99%