2008
DOI: 10.1211/jpp.60.12.0003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physicochemical interactions between drugs and superdisintegrants

Abstract: We have evaluated the interactions between superdisintegrants and drugs with different physicochemical characteristics, which may affect the in-vivo absorption e.g. after mucosal administration. The binding of sodium salicylate, naproxen, methyl hydroxybenzoate (methylparaben), ethyl hydroxybenzoate (ethylparaben), propyl hydroxybenzoate (propylparaben), atenolol, alprenolol, diphenhydramine, verapamil, amitriptyline and cetylpyridinium chloride monohydrate (CPC) to different superdisintegrants (sodium starch … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the lowest IDR value (3.87 ± 0.11%) of FUR from the ODT formulations was recorded with ODT formulation F8, which was prepared by using the lowest level of both CPV (B), 2%, and thymol (A), 10%. The presence of superdisintegrants in the tablet formulations enhanced the initial dissolution rate due to the high permeability of the tablet that could be obtained [ 33 , 34 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the lowest IDR value (3.87 ± 0.11%) of FUR from the ODT formulations was recorded with ODT formulation F8, which was prepared by using the lowest level of both CPV (B), 2%, and thymol (A), 10%. The presence of superdisintegrants in the tablet formulations enhanced the initial dissolution rate due to the high permeability of the tablet that could be obtained [ 33 , 34 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with a physiologically relevant ionic strength. Further, these interactions have not been observed to produce an in vivo effect. Other factors such as variability from the source of water due to differences in dissolved gases, ionic strength, etc. The Japanese Guideline describes a process to select the appropriate population for an in vivo BE study based on dissolution comparison . If the test and reference show a difference at pH 6.8 (between pH 3.0 and 6.8 for basic drugs) tested in the compendial buffer, the decision should be made to conduct a study in achlorhydric patients.…”
Section: Drug Permeabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with a physiologically relevant ionic strength. Further, these interactions have not been observed to produce an in vivo effect. …”
Section: Drug Permeabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%