2009
DOI: 10.3746/jkfn.2009.38.8.1076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physicochemical Properties of Non-waxy Rice Flour Affected by Grinding Methods and Steeping Times

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The protein content of DCDRF (5.38%) was higher than that of BCDRF (5.33%), but the ash and crude lipid contents of DCDRF (0.47 and 0.43%) were lower than those of BCDRF (0.63 and 0.53%). The compositions of the NDRFs decreased slightly and this trend was consistent with other researchers' results (8,(17)(18)(19). This was because water diffused into the rice kernels and some components, including soluble protein, sugars, and non-starch bound lipids, leached out of the rice during soaking.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The protein content of DCDRF (5.38%) was higher than that of BCDRF (5.33%), but the ash and crude lipid contents of DCDRF (0.47 and 0.43%) were lower than those of BCDRF (0.63 and 0.53%). The compositions of the NDRFs decreased slightly and this trend was consistent with other researchers' results (8,(17)(18)(19). This was because water diffused into the rice kernels and some components, including soluble protein, sugars, and non-starch bound lipids, leached out of the rice during soaking.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The apparent amylose contents and physical properties except solubility were higher in NDRF than in CDRF (p<0.05) (9,17,18). The reason the NDRF had higher amylose content than the CDRF might be that alkaline solution penetrated into the cell walls and gelatinized exposed starch granules easily, as water helps cell wall materials and starch granules loosen during soaking.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the particle size decreased, an increasing pattern of antioxidant activity was observed in control samples alone. This result indicated that the ultrafine grinding increased the antioxidant activity by increasing the specific surface area and capillary effect as the particle size decreased (normal grinding, 69.8%; fine grinding, 70.7%; and ultrafine grinding, 83.8%) [37][38][39]. For the roasting effect, the antioxidant activity values of all roasted samples showed no trend according to particle size, whereas that of roasted samples was significantly higher than that of the control (p < 0.05).…”
Section: Antioxidant Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the particle size decreased, an increasing pattern of antioxidant activity was observed in control samples alone. This result indicates that the ultrafine grinding increased the antioxidant activity by increasing the specific surface area and capillary effect as the particle size decreased (normal grinding, 69.8%; fine grinding, 70.7%; and ultrafine grinding, 83.8%) [36][37][38]. For the roasting effect, the antioxidant activity values of all roasted samples showed no trend according to particle size, whereas that of roasted samples was significantly higher than that of the control (p < 0.05).…”
Section: Antioxidant Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%