2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2007.05.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physicochemical stability of lipid injectable emulsions: Correlating changes in large globule distributions with phase separation behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20 Two main DSD characterization techniques have been widely used with parenteral emulsions: (1) single-particle optical sensing (SPOS) and (2) laser diffraction. SPOS may elucidate details of the DSD tail (on a distribution curve) of the larger droplets [21][22][23] and is based on light obscuration by individual large droplets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…20 Two main DSD characterization techniques have been widely used with parenteral emulsions: (1) single-particle optical sensing (SPOS) and (2) laser diffraction. SPOS may elucidate details of the DSD tail (on a distribution curve) of the larger droplets [21][22][23] and is based on light obscuration by individual large droplets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Gonyon et al 20 questioned the validity of USP's PFAT 5 limit based on single-point determination of the PFAT 5 of the native emulsion. They concluded that the USP's PFAT 5 limit, currently based on stability considerations, is not defined using the measured rate of change in large fat globules.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We followed the methodology previously described [17,26,27]. Analysis were performed using the previously calibrated PAMAS Particle Counter equipment (model SVSS, PAMAS GmbH, Sttutgart, Germany), utilizing a sensor HCB-LD-50/50, in extinction mode and software according to CFR 21 part 11.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diameters selected for the analysis were 2.0, 5.0, 7.5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 μm; the flow rate was 10 mL/min and the volume accuracy was ± 0.4 %. The calculation of PFATx was based on previous descriptions [27,28]. Particle sizes were grouped with their respective counts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%