2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.12.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physicochemical substance properties as indicators for unreliable exposure in microplate-based bioassays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
86
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Use of different plate formats with different volume to surface ratios may thus introduce confounding bioassay factors such as differences in sorption to and possible interaction with the plastic surface (Schreiber et al, 2008). Such confounding factors may potentially affect the freely dissolved concentration of hydrophobic chemicals (log Kow >3) in the bioassay and result in overestimation of the chemicals actual concentration in the assay (Brown et al, 2001;Mayer et al, 1999;Riedl and Altenburger, 2007). Despite potential for such confounding factors, no significant difference in Vtg protein production was observed in assays run in 6, 24 or 96 well formats with different total surface-volume ratio after 48 and 96 h of exposure.…”
Section: Plate Formatmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Use of different plate formats with different volume to surface ratios may thus introduce confounding bioassay factors such as differences in sorption to and possible interaction with the plastic surface (Schreiber et al, 2008). Such confounding factors may potentially affect the freely dissolved concentration of hydrophobic chemicals (log Kow >3) in the bioassay and result in overestimation of the chemicals actual concentration in the assay (Brown et al, 2001;Mayer et al, 1999;Riedl and Altenburger, 2007). Despite potential for such confounding factors, no significant difference in Vtg protein production was observed in assays run in 6, 24 or 96 well formats with different total surface-volume ratio after 48 and 96 h of exposure.…”
Section: Plate Formatmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Traditionally, the effect concentration obtained from a cell assay is based on the nominal concentration of a test chemical added to the culture medium at the start of the exposure period. However, studies have found volatile chemicals to significantly evaporate from microtiter plates, resulting in higher effect concentrations observed in microtiter plates than in sealed flasks (6,7). Studies have also found that serum protein in culture medium, microtiter plate plastic, and cell lipids significantly bind and reduce the free concentration of hydrophobic test chemicals in cell assays (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the 1990s, many researchers have attempted to optimize the procedure, performing tests at microscale using cuvettes, scintillation tubes, or microplates (Arensberg et al, 1995;Nguyen-Ngoc et al, 2009;Paixao et al, 2008;Rojiekova et al, 1998). The 24-or 96-well algal growth inhibition assay performed in a microplate, gave comparable results to standard flask bioassay for the tested algae (Thellen et al, 1990;Rojiekova et al, 1998;Eisentraeger et al, 2003;Horvatic et al, 2007;Riedl and Altenburger, 2007). This simpler method has been used in routine toxicity testing, pollutant phytotoxicity screening, and screening of sensitivity of algae.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%