1989
DOI: 10.1128/aem.55.11.2806-2814.1989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physicochemical surface properties of nonencapsulated and encapsulated coagulase-negative staphylococci

Abstract: Cell surfaces of three nonencapsulated and three encapsulated coagulase-negative staphylococci were characterized by their surface free energies, zeta potentials, and elemental and molecular compositions. Surface free energies were calculated from contact angle measurements with various liquids. All six strains showed a high surface free energy (103 to 126 mJ * m-2), estimated from the concept of polar and dispersion components. However, the hydrogen-donating surface free energy parameter was zero for all none… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This again is in accordance with the extremely high initial deposition rates of S. thermophilus B to negatively charged glass surfaces (1). In many of our previous studies on the physicochemistry of microbial cell surfaces, we found excellent relationships between zeta potentials, hydrophobicities, and elemental surface compositions of the cells (3,14,15). For oral streptococci, coagulase-negative staphylococci, and lactobacilli, amongst others, increasing cell surface hydrophobicity was accompanied by increasing N/C and decreasing O/C surface concentration ratios.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This again is in accordance with the extremely high initial deposition rates of S. thermophilus B to negatively charged glass surfaces (1). In many of our previous studies on the physicochemistry of microbial cell surfaces, we found excellent relationships between zeta potentials, hydrophobicities, and elemental surface compositions of the cells (3,14,15). For oral streptococci, coagulase-negative staphylococci, and lactobacilli, amongst others, increasing cell surface hydrophobicity was accompanied by increasing N/C and decreasing O/C surface concentration ratios.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…A similar observation has also been put forward by other authors concerning a correlation between cell surface hydrophobicity and charge (15,26). On the other hand, numerous previous studies on the physicochemistry of microbial cell surfaces have shown relationships between surface charges, hydrophobicity, and elemental surface compositions of the cells (9,20,42). They indicate that the presence of (glyco-)proteinaceous material at the cell surface results in a higher hydrophobicity (9), whereas a hydrophilic surface was associated with the presence of polysaccharides.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This is somewhat surprising, as bacterial cells generally show isoelectric points around pH 2 or 3·5 ( Mozes and Rouxhet 1987). Some authors have also observed the absence of isoelectric point with both nonencapsulated ( Van der Mei et al . 1989 ) and encapsulated staphylococci ( Busscher et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%