2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.spmi.2021.106925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physics based compact modeling of symmetric double gate MOS transistors with high mobility III-V channel material

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model predicted inversion layer capacitance (C inv ) and its validation with Schroedinger-Poisson solver result is shown in Figure-5. To demonstrate the flexibility and accuracy of our model, we have also compared ANN model predicted data with an analytical model calculated result based on an explicit solution of Schroedinger-Poisson equation for symmetric double-gate MOS-FET reported in[27]. In Figure-5, it is interesting to observe that, our ANN model predicts capacitance value with sufficient accuracy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The model predicted inversion layer capacitance (C inv ) and its validation with Schroedinger-Poisson solver result is shown in Figure-5. To demonstrate the flexibility and accuracy of our model, we have also compared ANN model predicted data with an analytical model calculated result based on an explicit solution of Schroedinger-Poisson equation for symmetric double-gate MOS-FET reported in[27]. In Figure-5, it is interesting to observe that, our ANN model predicts capacitance value with sufficient accuracy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…But there is a large difference between analytical model calculated value and ANN model predicted data. This is because the analytical model reported in [27] considers up to 2nd subband and electron contributions from higher-order subbands are neglected. In this case, since channel thickness t ch =10nm, the electron contribution from 3rd subband can't be neglected (as shown in , where E 2 value is below 0eV for higher gate bias voltage).…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%