2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12540-019-00317-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physics-Based Constitutive Model of Porous Materials for Die/Isostatic Compaction of Metallic Powders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The porous continuum model used in this continuum‐based approach has generally performed well for high relative density regions above 0.5 in porous materials, including powders with a tap density or higher. [ 25,26 ] It is remarkable that, as shown in Figure 4, this approach can also be applied to model cellular structures even at low relative densities. In the yield function used in the porous solid model (cf.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The porous continuum model used in this continuum‐based approach has generally performed well for high relative density regions above 0.5 in porous materials, including powders with a tap density or higher. [ 25,26 ] It is remarkable that, as shown in Figure 4, this approach can also be applied to model cellular structures even at low relative densities. In the yield function used in the porous solid model (cf.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A continuum approach to modeling of compaction of porous materials can be adopted for simulations of compression of crumpled thin foils as a potent alternative to direct simulations described earlier. We shall base the constitutive description of a continuum with porosity representing a crumpled foil material on the density‐dependent yield function approach proposed in the study by Kim et al and Seong et al [ 25,26 ] Specifically, a Green/Shima‐type yield function for a porous material with a relative density R is taken in the formAfalse(Rfalse)q2+Bfalse(Rfalse)p2=ηfalse(Rfalse)Y02=YnormalR2where A( R ), B( R ), and η( R ) are functions of R , q is the von Mises (deviatoric) effective stress, p is the hydrostatic pressure, Y 0 is the yield stress of nonporous monolithic material, and Y R is the yield stress of porous material with relative density R . In this study, we employed the model [ 25 ] for a continuum description of a crumpled material containing pores.…”
Section: Simulation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the numerous pressure-dependent constitutive models [20][21][22][23], the Drucker-Prager Cap (DPC) model is widely used to simulate the fabrication process of powderbased superconducting wires to predict the powder density or analyze the effect of process parameters on powder density [24][25][26][27][28][29]. Shah et al [24] first built a model for the drawing process of the Bismuth-Strontium-Calcium-Copper-Oxide (BSCCO) superconducting wire using the DPC model to predict the powder density and the drawing force.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transportation of sealed containers with a powder product with a high content of gas in its pores, in particular, for construction or food purposes, violates the principles of energy saving and energy efficiency. In contrast to the pressing of powders (Pizette et al, 2010;Bayle et al, 2016;Seong et al, 2020) or larger particles (Gai et al, 2005), deaeration refers to its initial stage, when there is no destruction of particles of the compacting medium. If it is necessary to obtain a special structure of a dispersed medium with given strength characteristics, it is advisable to use a mechanical deaeration method (Akiyama et al, 1986;Kapranova and Zaitzev, 2011) in particular, when obtaining granules from bitumen and mineral powder (Zaitsev et al, 2010), dry dye mixtures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these purposes, as a rule, the mechanics of heterogeneous systems are used (Nigmatulin, 1978;Generalov, 2002). The analytical results (Kapranova et al, 2000;Kapranova, 2010;Kapranova et al, 2015) when describing the behavior of the system solid particles-gas have some advantages over numerical solutions, (Pizette et al, 2010;Bayle et al, 2016;Seong et al, 2020) for example, when choosing rational ranges for changing the main parameters of the compaction process or when evaluating their optimal values (Kapranova et al, 2001;Kapranova et al, 2006a;Kapranova et al, 2006b). The importance of understanding the mechanism of the behavior of compacted materials is obvious for any type of modeling methods: analytical (Kapranova and Zaitzev, 2011;Kapranova et al, 2015;Udalov et al, 2019) or numerical (Khoei, 2005;Pizette et al, 2010;Bayle et al, 2016;Seong et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%