2020
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physics-Based Simulations to Predict the Differential Effects of Motor Control and Musculoskeletal Deficits on Gait Dysfunction in Cerebral Palsy: A Retrospective Case Study

Abstract: Physics-based simulations of walking have the theoretical potential to support clinical decision-making by predicting the functional outcome of treatments in terms of walking performance. Yet before using such simulations in clinical practice, their ability to identify the main treatment targets in specific patients needs to be demonstrated. In this study, we generated predictive simulations of walking with a medical imaging based neuro-musculoskeletal model of a child with cerebral palsy presenting crouch gai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
83
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the synergy vector weights associated with "remaining" postures in Ajiboye and Weir (2009) or "excluded" muscles in Bianco et al (2018) were not predicted without knowledge of the muscle excitations being treated as unmeasured but rather were fitted with knowledge of those excitations using least square algorithms. Several other studies have imposed synergy structures on muscle excitations or activations through optimization when estimating knee contact force (Walter et al, 2014), joint stiffness (Shourijeh and Fregly, 2020), or motion (Clark et al, 2009;Allen and Neptune, 2012;Meyer et al, 2016;Mehrabi et al, 2019;Falisse et al, 2020). Imposing a muscle synergy structure on predicted muscle excitations or activations can not only eliminate discontinuities between neighboring time frames but also reduce the number of design variables in the optimization problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the synergy vector weights associated with "remaining" postures in Ajiboye and Weir (2009) or "excluded" muscles in Bianco et al (2018) were not predicted without knowledge of the muscle excitations being treated as unmeasured but rather were fitted with knowledge of those excitations using least square algorithms. Several other studies have imposed synergy structures on muscle excitations or activations through optimization when estimating knee contact force (Walter et al, 2014), joint stiffness (Shourijeh and Fregly, 2020), or motion (Clark et al, 2009;Allen and Neptune, 2012;Meyer et al, 2016;Mehrabi et al, 2019;Falisse et al, 2020). Imposing a muscle synergy structure on predicted muscle excitations or activations can not only eliminate discontinuities between neighboring time frames but also reduce the number of design variables in the optimization problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of motor pool activation using multi-muscle sEMG can also be complemented by a statistical analysis of the muscle activity profiles and their decomposition into a small set of socalled muscle modules or common basic activation components (see the previous section) as a means to look backward from the periphery to the spinal cord motor programming and output (130,131). There are now several studies that evaluated the spinal locomotor output, its spatiotemporal organization and impairment in children with CP (37,100,(107)(108)(109)(110)(111)(112)(113)(114)(115)(116)(117)(118)(119)(120). Figure 3C illustrates the spinal maps of MN activation during walking and typical features of motor output impairment in children with CP compared to TD children obtained using the averaged rectified sEMG profiles of multiple leg muscles as an indirect measure of the net MN firing in the spinal cord.…”
Section: Spinal Segmental Motoneuron Outputmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple scientific domains are transitioning toward personalised approaches where diagnosis or treatment are based on individual characteristics (35). Such personalized approaches are crucial to improve our understanding of movement in healthy populations (36) as well as in populations with neurological disorders (37). Importantly, these approaches require the identification of an individual's unique features, but this is rarely performed for muscle activation.…”
Section: Applications and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%