2023
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2023.3245281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physics-Informed Supervised Residual Learning for Electromagnetic Modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, exploiting the native graphic processing unit (GPU) implementations of GNNs [11], GEM can solve Maxwell's equations up to 40 times faster than conventional FDTD based on central processing unit (CPU) parallelization while yielding exactly the same results; interestingly, we also observe that GEM is at least twice as fast as state-of-the-art FDTD implementations that exploit advanced optimizations and parallelization, e.g., grid chunking [7], even if our solution does not yet adopt those same techniques. Contrary to some recent trends in the literature [12]- [17], it is shown that it's not necessary to identify appropriate input features or deep learning architectures aimed at training datadriven CEM models. Instead, FDTD equations can be intrinsically transformed into a GEM model that fundamentally outperforms the legacy implementation of the full-wave solver in terms of computational performance, without any need for training.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, exploiting the native graphic processing unit (GPU) implementations of GNNs [11], GEM can solve Maxwell's equations up to 40 times faster than conventional FDTD based on central processing unit (CPU) parallelization while yielding exactly the same results; interestingly, we also observe that GEM is at least twice as fast as state-of-the-art FDTD implementations that exploit advanced optimizations and parallelization, e.g., grid chunking [7], even if our solution does not yet adopt those same techniques. Contrary to some recent trends in the literature [12]- [17], it is shown that it's not necessary to identify appropriate input features or deep learning architectures aimed at training datadriven CEM models. Instead, FDTD equations can be intrinsically transformed into a GEM model that fundamentally outperforms the legacy implementation of the full-wave solver in terms of computational performance, without any need for training.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In this direction, the use of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and sequence models, such as long short-term memory networks has been explored [12]- [16]. Despite being able to capture spatiotemporal correlations, the scalability of such models as standalone solvers of Maxwell's equations is innately limited.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such integration has been shown its accuracy, reliability, and interpretability of predictions in various applications [4]- [9]. When DL is taken as a numerical solver, including a computational electromagnetic (EM) one, NNs are typically regarded as function approximators [10]- [14], functional approximators [15]- [20] or operator approximators [21], [22]. In this work, we are interested in taking NNs as function approximators where the EM data is regarded as the function with respect to the spatial coordinate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%