2017
DOI: 10.54947/9781930524941
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physics of the Body

Abstract: Physics of the Body provides a wealth of information on the relationship between physics and the functions of the various systems of the body, such as the eyes, ears, lungs, and heart. The authors’ enthusiasm and good humor have delighted readers for years. Although it was written primarily as a text for students who have some knowledge of elementary physics, the book is interesting and understandable to any person who is curious about how the body works. This book is intended primarily for student… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The densities of samples containing 30 and 40 vol.% of pore formers are highly reduced, around 60% with respect to the same Ti-xTa sample without large pores. This is beneficial for bone implants applications since the density reported for trabecular bones ranged between 0.8 and 1 g/cm 3 and compact bones ranges between 1.2 and 2 g/cm 3 [ 41 , 42 ]. This means that samples with 40 vol.% of pores are in the range, which are also in the range of the optimal density value 1.8 g/cm 3 suggested by Adamovic et al for bone implants [ 43 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The densities of samples containing 30 and 40 vol.% of pore formers are highly reduced, around 60% with respect to the same Ti-xTa sample without large pores. This is beneficial for bone implants applications since the density reported for trabecular bones ranged between 0.8 and 1 g/cm 3 and compact bones ranges between 1.2 and 2 g/cm 3 [ 41 , 42 ]. This means that samples with 40 vol.% of pores are in the range, which are also in the range of the optimal density value 1.8 g/cm 3 suggested by Adamovic et al for bone implants [ 43 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The density of the two-layer sample is 6.16 g/cm 3 , which reduces the density of porous Ta by 20%. Note that the density of human bones is in the range 0.8-1 g/cm 3 for trabecular bones and 1.2-2 g/cm 3 for compact bones [38,39], and it has been suggested that the optimal weight density for an implant is 1.8 g/cm 3 [40].…”
Section: Microstructural Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The box in Figure 1 represents this substantial volume, which is ≈340 times the chicken's skeleton volume at hatching, based on a bone density of 1900 kg m −3 . [ 21 ] Thus, the mineralization process raises a considerable challenge in terms of throughput of serum and transport of ions from the serum to the site of deposition. While calcium‐binding proteins, most notably Fetuin‐A, [ 22 ] are known to support the vascular transport of calcium, the situation is much less clear when it comes to the transport beyond the vascular system, through newly formed collagenous osteoid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%