2012
DOI: 10.1063/1.3701168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physics of ultra-high bioproductivity in algal photobioreactors

Abstract: Cultivating algae at high densities in thin photobioreactors engenders time scales for random cell motion that approach photosynthetic rate-limiting time scales. This synchronization allows bioproductivity above that achieved with conventional strategies. We show that a diffusion model for cell motion (1) accounts for high bioproductivity at irradiance values previously deemed restricted by photoinhibition, (2) predicts the existence of optimal culture densities and their dependence on irradiance, consistent w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The quest to improve the bioproductivity of algae is largely prompted by their value for biofuels, nutritional supplements, and pharmaceuticals (Borowitzka and Moheimani, 2013). Previous investigations have focused on (1) trying to improve the efficiency with which the photosynthetic apparatus can exploit incident photons as well as (2) more efficiently distributing those photons among the algae in a photobioreactor (Tennessen et al, 1995;Gebremariam and Zarmi, 2012;Greenwald et al, 2012;Zarmi et al, 2013;Gordon and Polle, 2007;Abu-Ghosh et al, 2015).…”
Section: Background and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quest to improve the bioproductivity of algae is largely prompted by their value for biofuels, nutritional supplements, and pharmaceuticals (Borowitzka and Moheimani, 2013). Previous investigations have focused on (1) trying to improve the efficiency with which the photosynthetic apparatus can exploit incident photons as well as (2) more efficiently distributing those photons among the algae in a photobioreactor (Tennessen et al, 1995;Gebremariam and Zarmi, 2012;Greenwald et al, 2012;Zarmi et al, 2013;Gordon and Polle, 2007;Abu-Ghosh et al, 2015).…”
Section: Background and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Maintaining the optimum illumination throughout a photobioreactor is inhibited by self-shading, where cells closest to the light source receive excess illumination at the detriment of cells deeper within the culture, which are less illuminated. [12][13][14][15] This effect can be mitigated by continuously mixing, causing cells to travel between high and low intensity regions of the photobioreactor, such that they receive the optimal timeaveraged intensity. Bioreactors have shown increased performance with increased mixing due to improved chemical transport and better light utilization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bioreactors have shown increased performance with increased mixing due to improved chemical transport and better light utilization. [12][13][14]16 Another important irradiance parameter is spectral composition. Microalgal growth is dependent on wavelength by virtue of cell pigmentation, which varies largely between species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When light passes through the PBR, microalgae will absorb part of such light and transform it into chemical energy. The equation describing the absorption of light is called the Lambert-Beer Law, which states that (Greenwald, Gordon & Zarmi, 2012): Where z is the depth of the flat plate PBR, X is cell density of microalgae, α is the absorption coefficient, I(z) is the irradiance at the length z, and I 0 is the irradiance of the light source. For the design of the PBR it is important to maintain sufficient light imposed upon the microalgae to saturate the active sites during the passage of the photon, but just enough to ensure that photoinhibition does not take place.…”
Section: Light Regimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 shows the employed model parameters. The values were taken from different authors (Carvalho & Malcata, 2001;Kurano & Miyachi, 2005;Greenwald et al, 2012;Chisti, 1989) or calculated assuming that we operate at the assumed conditions previously described. If it reaches steady state and establishes optimal growth rate conditions, the analysis will be conducted like a single chemostat without biomass input, i.e., equation 13, since it is the operation that would give higher productivity.…”
Section: Ii)mentioning
confidence: 99%