1980
DOI: 10.1002/cne.901940407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physilogy and morphology of substantia gelatinosa neurons intracellularly stained with horserdish peroxidase

Abstract: Neurons in Rexed's layer II were physiologically characterized with natural and electrical stimuli applied to their cutaneous receptive fields. The neurons were then intracellularly stained with horseradish peroxidase. Three general patterns of physiological responses were found. Nociceptive specific neurons did not respond to gentle mechanical stimulation. Most responded exclusively to tissue-damaging stimuli. Some also responded to moderately heavy pressure, but these responded to noxious stimuli with an inc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
89
2

Year Published

1983
1983
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 231 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
89
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed localization of Fos-like immunoreactive neurons in tumour-bearing rats would best fit the pattern observed in monoarthritic rats (LanteriMinet et al, 1993) even if the time-courses differ. In tumourbearing rats, the detection of Fos labelling in nociceptive responding areas (Besson and Chaouch, 1987) is not in conflict with our previous suggestions since these areas are not specific for pain (Bennet et al, 1980;Menetrey, 1987). Thus, the presence of a tumoural process provokes functional alterations in spinal cord activity, demonstrating that a tumour actively proliferating in the limb sends afferent signals to the central nervous system, signals which are probably unrelated to pain.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…The observed localization of Fos-like immunoreactive neurons in tumour-bearing rats would best fit the pattern observed in monoarthritic rats (LanteriMinet et al, 1993) even if the time-courses differ. In tumourbearing rats, the detection of Fos labelling in nociceptive responding areas (Besson and Chaouch, 1987) is not in conflict with our previous suggestions since these areas are not specific for pain (Bennet et al, 1980;Menetrey, 1987). Thus, the presence of a tumoural process provokes functional alterations in spinal cord activity, demonstrating that a tumour actively proliferating in the limb sends afferent signals to the central nervous system, signals which are probably unrelated to pain.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…Double labeling of trigeminal ganglion neurons for PRV and substance P suggests that these lamina I projection neurons are acted on by peptide-containing nociceptive primary afferents, consistent with recent reports (Ding et al, 1995a,b) demonstrating that some lamina I neurons that project to the parabrachial complex express the substance P receptor. Although we could not discern the morphology of the lamina II neurons, some presumably correspond to the stalk cell, a proposed excitatory interneuron, the axon of which arborizes exclusively in lamina I (Bennett et al, 1980). On the other hand, because columns of cells were found throughout the depths of the substantia gelatinosa, it is likely that there was also labeling of the islet cells that populate the substantia gelatinosa.…”
Section: Transneuronal Labeling Of Inputs To the Lamina I Projection mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Although exquisitely sensitive A␦ tactile afferents are present in human hairy skin nerves (Adriaensen et al, 1983) (but see Olausson et al, 2002;Cole et al, 2006), knowledge of their potential role in sensation is hampered by a lack of microstimulation studies. Nevertheless, substantial numbers of SG neurons respond well to light tactile stimuli, whether touch-specific or wide dynamic range neurons Bennett et al, 1980) (for review, see Light, 1992). Historically, while inhibition of nociceptive transmission by tactile inputs has received the most attention (Melzack and Wall, 1965) [see also Narikawa et al (2000) and Lu and Perl (2003)], recent studies suggest that most SG circuits are excitatory (Lu and Perl, 2005;Santos et al, 2007) and that incoming sensory information is relayed to neurons outside the SG (Giesler et al, 1978;Willis et al, 1978;Light, 1992;Eckert et al, 2003).…”
Section: Substantia Gelatinosa: Pleasure or Pain?mentioning
confidence: 99%