Fetal and Neonatal Physiology 2017
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-323-35214-7.00016-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiologic Effects of Multiple Pregnancy on Mother and Fetus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increased risk for complications such as growth abnormalities, preterm birth, and neurological deficits are seen with multiple births (Amorosa et al, 2017). Studies suggest increased vulnerability of male fetuses to prenatal insults, for example, gestational stress, maternal infection, and drug exposure, affecting the male's health long-term (Bale et al, 2010;DiPietro & Voegtline, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Increased risk for complications such as growth abnormalities, preterm birth, and neurological deficits are seen with multiple births (Amorosa et al, 2017). Studies suggest increased vulnerability of male fetuses to prenatal insults, for example, gestational stress, maternal infection, and drug exposure, affecting the male's health long-term (Bale et al, 2010;DiPietro & Voegtline, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous results showed that same‐sex female twins have the highest risk of disordered eating, followed by opposite‐sex female twins, opposite‐sex male twins and lastly, the lowest risk was seen for same‐sex male twins (Culbert et al, 2008). Increased risk for complications such as growth abnormalities, preterm birth, and neurological deficits are seen with multiple births (Amorosa et al, 2017). Studies suggest increased vulnerability of male fetuses to prenatal insults, for example, gestational stress, maternal infection, and drug exposure, affecting the male's health long‐term (Bale et al, 2010; DiPietro & Voegtline, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%