2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.02.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiological and fitness response of flowers to temperature and water augmentation in a high Andean geophyte

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
21
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although several were lost, Yr-2 flower-heads seemed to last fewer days. This is consistent with other studies in the Chilean Andes which show that single flowers stay open longer upon water addition [ 70 ], in wetter years [ 45 ] and under cooler temperatures [ 22 ]. Shorter lived flower-heads imply less temporal overlap among open flower-heads and hence fewer flower-heads open at any one time.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Although several were lost, Yr-2 flower-heads seemed to last fewer days. This is consistent with other studies in the Chilean Andes which show that single flowers stay open longer upon water addition [ 70 ], in wetter years [ 45 ] and under cooler temperatures [ 22 ]. Shorter lived flower-heads imply less temporal overlap among open flower-heads and hence fewer flower-heads open at any one time.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Work with L. bicolor and the closely related L. androsaceus has demonstrated that flowers of Leptosiphon lose substantial amounts of water, and plants may produce smaller flowers in drier locations or conditions in order to limit that loss (Lambrecht, 2013; Lambrecht, Morrow, & Hussey, 2017). Floral water loss of Leptosiphon and other plant species has been shown to affect leaf physiology and can lead to reduced gas exchange, particularly in dry conditions (Dudley, Arroyo, & Fernandez‐Murillo, 2018; Galen, Sherry, & Carroll, 1999; Lambrecht, 2013). In this study, plants from both Domino and Kingbird Pond produced smaller flowers with both the natural and experimental droughts, perhaps because they flowered later after the onset of the terminal drought, when floral water loss would have been more deleterious.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, we dissected the phenotypic basis of dramatic differences in seed set between M. guttatus and M. nasutus under drought, exploring vegetative and reproductive traits, developmental rates, and survival across the life cycle. Is the larger flowered M. guttatus more vulnerable to desiccation (e.g., Dudley, Arroyo, & Fernández‐Murillo, ; Galen, Sherry, & Carroll, ) due to increased floral input? Do Mimulus taxa show variation in leaf traits related to water use efficiency?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%