Physiological and rating of perceived exertion responses to resistance training sessions with and without vascular occlusion

Araújo, Amanda C. de; Junior, Adalberto Ferreira; Oliveira, Stefany Kananda de; Schamne, Julio Cezar; Okuno, Nilo Massaru

doi:10.3233/ies-160650

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This procedure was performed in the analyses of protocols that compared fixed repetition BFR exercise versus failure non-BFR exercise; after we removed 1 study, 28 heterogeneity was reduced and the results were maintained [SMD = −0.96 (95% CI = −1.08 to −0.30); P < 0.01; I ² = 0%]. Similarly, after removing 2 studies 4,72 of the comparisons performed for low-intensity exercise with BFR (arbitrary pressure) versus non-BFR low-intensity exercise, the results were maintained and heterogeneity was reduced [SMD = −0.04 (95% CI = −0.29 to 0.36); P = 0.83; I ² = 0%].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The studies included a total 573 subjects (females, n = 141; males, n = 432). Sixteen studies (53%) examined women who participated in resistance training programs, [3][4][5][6]12,23,24,33,34,42,[48][49][50]54,70,71 12 studies (40%) analyzed untrained women, 13,18,29,41,43,45,53,58,63,66,73,74 and only 2 studies (7%) did not report information about prior participation in resistance training programs. 31,32 Two studies analyzed elderly women, 53,58 whereas the other studies analyzed young women.…”

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Acute Effect of Resistance Training With Blood Flow Restriction on Perceptual Responses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Queiros

Rolnick

Santos

et al. 2022

Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Context: Several studies have compared perceptual responses between resistance exercise with blood flow restriction and traditional resistance exercise (non-BFR). However, the results were contradictory. Objectives: To analyze the effect of RE+BFR versus non-BFR resistance exercise [low-load resistance exercise (LL-RE) or high-load resistance exercise (HL-RE)] on perceptual responses. Data Sources: CINAHL, Cochrane Library, PubMed®, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science were searched through August 28, 2021, and again on August 25, 2022. Study Selection: Studies comparing the effect of RE+BFR versus non-BFR resistance exercise on rate of perceived exertion (RPE) and muscle pain/discomfort were considered. Meta-analyses were conducted using the random effects model. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Level of Evidence: Level 2. Data Extraction: All data were reviewed and extracted independently by 2 reviewers. Disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer. Results: Thirty studies were included in this review. In a fixed repetition scheme, the RPE [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 1.04; P < 0.01] and discomfort (SMD = 1.10; P < 0.01) were higher in RE+BFR than in non-BFR LL-RE, but similar in sets to voluntary failure. There were no significant differences in RPE in the comparisons between RE+BFR and non-BFR HL-RE; after sensitivity analyses, it was found that the RPE was higher in non-BFR HL-RE in a fixed repetition scheme. In sets to voluntary failure, discomfort was higher in RE+BFR versus non-BFR HL-RE (SMD = 0.95; P < 0. 01); however, in a fixed scheme, the results were similar. Conclusion: In sets to voluntary failure, RPE is similar between RE+BFR and non-BFR exercise. In fixed repetition schemes, RE+BFR seems to promote higher RPE than non-BFR LL-RE and less than HL-RE. In sets to failure, discomfort appears to be similar between LL-RE with and without BFR; however, RE+BFR appears to promote greater discomfort than HL-RE. In fixed repetition schemes, the discomfort appears to be no different between RE+BFR and HL-RE, but is lower in non-BFR LL-RE.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Acute Effect of Resistance Training With Blood Flow Restriction on Perceptual Responses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Queiros

Rolnick

Santos

et al. 2022

Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It has been reported that combining BFR with aerobic exercise improves VO2max 9,10 and promotes similar gains in muscle strength and hypertrophy to high-load exercise in young healthy men 11 . Furthermore, several studies compared the acute responses of HR and RPE during resistance 12,13 and aerobic exercise 14 and verified equal or lower hemodynamic responses during or after exercise when performed with BFR compared to high-load exercise without BFR. Additionally, in the study of Ferreira, et al 15 , lower hemodynamic responses and improvement in time and frequency domain indices of HRV were verified during recovery from low-load aerobic exercise with BFR compared to a high-load session in elderly participants.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 96%

Cardiac autonomic responses during and after a single session of aerobic exercise with and without blood flow restriction

Schamne

Junior

Araújo

et al. 2019

Motriz: rev. educ. fis.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To verify the on and off heart rate (HR) and HR variability (HRV) kinetics during a high-load aerobic exercise and a low-load aerobic exercise, with and without blood flow restriction (BFR). Methods: Fourteen healthy male subjects performed three randomly assigned experimental sessions: 1) 10 minutes walking at 40% of maximal aerobic speed (MAS) (40LL); 2) 10 minutes walking at 40% of MAS with BFR (40LL+BFR); and 3) 10 minutes running at 70% of MAS (70HL). The HR and HRV measurements were taken at rest, during exercise and the recovery period after constant load sessions. Results: The HR on-and off-kinetics, and HRV on-kinetics were faster in 40LL than in 40LL +BFR and 70HL (p < 0.05). The time constant (τon) of HR on-kinetics was faster in 40LL+BFR than in 70HL (23.4 ± 9.5 s vs 42 ± 9.5 s, respectively, p < 0.01), and was accompanied by faster HRV on-kinetics (12.4 ± 9.6 s vs 20.3 ± 13.7 s, respectively, p < 0.01). Although HR off-kinetics was not different between 40LL+BFR and 70HL, the recovery of time and frequency HRV indices were delayed in 70HL when compared to 40LL and 40LL+BFR (p < 0.05). Conclusions: These findings indicate that 40LL promoted faster cardiac adjustments compared to 40LL+BFR and 70HL sessions. Additionally, 40LL+BFR promoted faster cardiac adjustment and better HRV recovery compared to the 70HL session.

show abstract

“…BFR exercise may be useful in knee OA treatment because of the possibility of strength gains associated with lower levels of pain, perceived exertion, overload, and joint stress during the training sessions compared with high-intensity (≥60% of 1-RM) resistance exercise (HIRE) without BFR [13–16]. However, it is unclear whether BRF is really required, even in resistance exercises with loads less than 30% of 1-RM [8, 17].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of blood flow restriction exercise with very low load and low volume in patients with knee osteoarthritis: protocol for a randomized trial

Cerqueira

Vieira

2019

Trials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is characterized by chronic pain, physical dysfunction, and reduced quality of life. Low-load resistance exercises with blood flow restriction (BFR) have presented results similar to those of high-intensity resistance exercise (HIRE) without BFR provided that the exercise volume in both is paired. However, it is unclear whether BFR exercise with reduced load and volume generates clinical improvements similar to those of HIRE. The aim of the proposed study is to evaluate the effects of BFR resistance exercise with very low load and low volume against HIRE in patients with knee OA for the outcomes of knee pain, muscle performance, physical function, disease severity, quality of life, perceived exertion during the exercises, adherence, and patient satisfaction with treatment. Methods This two-arm, prospectively registered, randomized controlled trial with blinded assessors and volunteers will involve 40 patients with knee OA. Two weekly treatment sessions will be provided for 12 weeks. Patients will perform very low-load (10% of 1-RM) and low-volume BFR exercise or HIRE (60% of 1-RM) for strengthening thigh muscles. The primary outcome will be the knee pain measured after 12 weeks of treatment. The secondary outcomes include knee pain 6 months after randomization, physical function, disease severity, quality of life, muscle performance, knee pain and perceived exertion during exercise, adherence, and patient satisfaction with treatment. Discussion If the improvements in the outcomes are similar in the two groups, BFR exercise with reduced load and volume may be an interesting alternative in the treatment of knee OA, especially when exercises with high loads generate joint pain. Trial registration Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clínicos (REBEC), RBR-6pcrfm . Registered on July 10, 2018. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3238-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

show abstract

Physiological and rating of perceived exertion responses to resistance training sessions with and without vascular occlusion

Cited by 4 publications

References 17 publications

Acute Effect of Resistance Training With Blood Flow Restriction on Perceptual Responses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Acute Effect of Resistance Training With Blood Flow Restriction on Perceptual Responses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Cardiac autonomic responses during and after a single session of aerobic exercise with and without blood flow restriction

Effects of blood flow restriction exercise with very low load and low volume in patients with knee osteoarthritis: protocol for a randomized trial

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About