2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2021.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiological and transcriptional changes provide insights into the effect of root waterlogging on the aboveground part of Pterocarya stenoptera

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 D). This is consistent with the results of previous studies [ 56 ]. We speculated that ZNL2067 may have eliminated excess ROS after being submerged for 3 days.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…2 D). This is consistent with the results of previous studies [ 56 ]. We speculated that ZNL2067 may have eliminated excess ROS after being submerged for 3 days.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…In contrast, Wang et al [ 34 ] found that the activities of SOD, CAT, and POD were significantly decreased in Phalaris arundinacea in response to waterlogging stress. The reason for these two different results may be due to different treatment times and genotypes [ 45 ]. In this study, we identified 124 DEGs associated with the antioxidant system, in which most genes were downregulated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major function of plant endogenous hormones is to regulate plant growth, development and fruit ripening, and also could improve the tolerance of the plant to environmental factors, such as hypoxic stress ( Li et al., 2021 ). Ethylene, as a gaseous phytohormone and a signal of hypoxia, could be significantly increased by hypoxic stress in plants ( Visser and Pierik, 2007 ) and affect the expression of genes related to ethylene synthesis, ROS-signaling, and antioxidant system, as well as promote the adventitious formation and cell wall degradation ( Khan et al., 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%