2000
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2000.531.41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiological Changes of Pepino (Solanum Muricatum Ait.) During Maturation and Ripening

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0
4

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
7
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Physiological disorders reported by Ahumada and Cantwell (1996) included CI that caused internal and external discoloration, and decay symptoms due to a dark brown rot starting at the stem and eventually developing within the fruit pulp. Huyskens-Keil et al (2000) studied physiological changes in pepino at 5°C and 18°C for three different maturity stages, and concluded that changes in external and internal quality only occurred up to 14 d of storage, thereafter pepino quality remained almost constant. Martínez-Romero et al (2003) studied pepino cv.…”
Section: Postharvest Handling and Physiological Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physiological disorders reported by Ahumada and Cantwell (1996) included CI that caused internal and external discoloration, and decay symptoms due to a dark brown rot starting at the stem and eventually developing within the fruit pulp. Huyskens-Keil et al (2000) studied physiological changes in pepino at 5°C and 18°C for three different maturity stages, and concluded that changes in external and internal quality only occurred up to 14 d of storage, thereafter pepino quality remained almost constant. Martínez-Romero et al (2003) studied pepino cv.…”
Section: Postharvest Handling and Physiological Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pepino fruits were harvested at two ripening stages, i.e., mature and physiological ripe. The fruit quality characteristics of the ripening classes used in this study are described by Huyskens-Keil et al (2000). Fruits were selected according to uniformity in colour, shape and size (250-350 g fresh weight and 60-90 mm diameter) as well as for lack of injuries and foreign odour.…”
Section: Plant Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, harvesting pepino fruit at the appropriate stage of maturity is essential for a high pepino quality (Ahumada & Cantwell, 1996;Gonzalez et al, 2000). Moreover, depending on the ripening stage, the storage conditions have a strong impact on the postharvest physiology and shelf life of pepino (Huyskens-Keil, Prono-Widayat, Lü dders, Schreiner, & Peters, 2000;Prono-Widayat, Schreiner, Huyskens-Keil, & Lü dders, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently harvested fruits were analyzed for their vitamin C, chemical and phenolic contents. At the end of the storage period, 15 days after harvest (DAH), a period of fruit weight loss was compared to 30 DAH according to Huyskens-Keil et al (2000) and Mateos (2015), even as the external (flesh/exocarp) and internal fruit color (mesocarp) (C), firmness (F), dry matter content (DM), total titratable acidity (TA), total soluble solids (TSS) and pH, were analyzed and the evaluations were done comparing the two storage forms (room and cold). Fruits were placed in styrofoam trays and evaluated for shriveling, pitting and decay by hedonic scores (HS) where 1 equals none, 2 equals slight, 3 equals moderate, 4 equals moderately severe and 5 equals severe (Cantwell et al, 1992).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%