2013
DOI: 10.3109/02699052.2013.857787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiological emotional under-arousal in individuals with mild head injury

Abstract: The under-arousal in traumatic brain injury has been hypothesized to be associated with ventromedial prefrontal cortex disruption. This under-arousal may be mirrored in persons who self-report experiencing subtle head trauma. Students who reported MHI may be less able to physiologically respond and/or cognitively appraise stressful experiences as compared to their no-MHI cohort; and experience subtle persistent consequences despite the subtle nature of the reported head trauma.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
26
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
(167 reference statements)
3
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It was hypothesized that athletes would endorse more aggression compared to nonathletes and that individuals with a history of concussion would endorse higher levels of aggression compared to those without a prior concussion, independent of athletic status. Consistent with the continuum of injury severity (Iverson & Lange, 2009) and previous research (e.g., Baker & Good, 2014; van Noordt & Good, 2011), those with a history of concussion were expected to exhibit lower levels of baseline physiological arousal (i.e., attenuated EDA) compared to those without a prior concussion. Lastly, as per the somatic marker hypothesis (Damasio, 1994), it was predicted that physiological arousal would mediate the relationship between injury severity and aggression whereby those with more severe concussive impacts would exhibit lower levels of arousal and subsequently higher levels of reactive aggression.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It was hypothesized that athletes would endorse more aggression compared to nonathletes and that individuals with a history of concussion would endorse higher levels of aggression compared to those without a prior concussion, independent of athletic status. Consistent with the continuum of injury severity (Iverson & Lange, 2009) and previous research (e.g., Baker & Good, 2014; van Noordt & Good, 2011), those with a history of concussion were expected to exhibit lower levels of baseline physiological arousal (i.e., attenuated EDA) compared to those without a prior concussion. Lastly, as per the somatic marker hypothesis (Damasio, 1994), it was predicted that physiological arousal would mediate the relationship between injury severity and aggression whereby those with more severe concussive impacts would exhibit lower levels of arousal and subsequently higher levels of reactive aggression.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Importantly, when investigating potential mechanisms of this relationship, it was found that physiological arousal was a partial mediator of the relationship between injury severity and physical aggression, such that those with more severe injuries exhibited lower levels of physiological arousal, which in turn accounted for higher levels of aggression. Consistent with previous work indicating physiological dysregulation after concussion (e.g., Alcock et al., 2018; Baker & Good, 2014; van Noordt & Good, 2011), these findings imply that aggressive behaviors may be associated with concussion history (i.e., physiological underarousal), over and above athletic status, due to physiological unpreparedness. Alternatively, due to their chronically underaroused state, these athletes may be more likely to engage in aggressive forms of play in an attempt to increase their baseline levels of alertness; however, the current study did not directly test these potential explanations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…11 In the past, self-reported mild TBI has been linked with cognitive, neuropsychological, and physical impairments. [26][27][28][29][30] Therefore, we feel participants' self-reports are a valid measure of having had a concussion. Participants in the non-TBI group were required to have never had a concussion.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%