1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf01569988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiological methods to study biofilm disinfection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The action of OPA on the respiratory activity of the biofilm was evaluated by determining the oxygen uptake rate due to glucose oxidation, which according to Stewart et al (1994) and McFeters et al (1995) may be more accurate than the traditional method of colony formation on agar medium. This latter method has received much criticism especially when used to evaluate the effect of the antimicrobial agents (MacDonald et al, 2000).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The action of OPA on the respiratory activity of the biofilm was evaluated by determining the oxygen uptake rate due to glucose oxidation, which according to Stewart et al (1994) and McFeters et al (1995) may be more accurate than the traditional method of colony formation on agar medium. This latter method has received much criticism especially when used to evaluate the effect of the antimicrobial agents (MacDonald et al, 2000).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all cases, biocide efficiency was evaluated through plate counting techniques, which may overestimate OPA action since cells may remain viable after biocide treatment, but because they are stressed they may not able to grow on solid growth media (Stewart et al, 1994;McFeters et al, 1995) or may aggregate leading to the underestimation of the culturable cells. Recently, Simõ es et al (2003b) demonstrated that the disinfection action of OPA was substantially reduced for biofilms formed under low shear compared to suspended bacteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kaprelyants and Kell (55) showed that by use of FCM, Micrococcus luteus cells could be divided in viable, non-viable, and non-viable but resuscitable cell populations. McFeters and co-workers used rhodamine 123 to assess the physiological activity of bacteria in biofilms (79,152,153). They compared the rhodamine assay with the DVC (nalidixic acid) method, CTC reduction, RNA turnover, and plate count method.…”
Section: Flow Cytometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increase in organic matter at increasing glucose concentrations suggests that after covering the membrane surface, biofilm growth and accumulation happened in the vertical direction, i.e., in thickness. This cannot be verified since epifluorescence microscopy, although an established technology for viewing biofilms on surfaces, is limited in its applicability for analyzing thickness [31]. However, considering the conditions set for Run A and Run B were different, the SS deposition mechanism might be different in the two runs.…”
Section: Interaction Between Biofilm and Suspended Solidsmentioning
confidence: 99%