1940
DOI: 10.1038/icb.1940.29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiological Ontogeny in the Tobacco Plant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

1948
1948
1976
1976

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In later studies with the tobacco plant, Petrie achieved alteration in ontogeny by preventing inflorescence development. Changes in dry weight and leaf area were reported by Petrie, Watson & Ward (32), and changes in nitrogen content by Watson & Petrie (49). In all of this work the significance of relationships at higher levels of organisation of the plant body was stressed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 50%
“…In later studies with the tobacco plant, Petrie achieved alteration in ontogeny by preventing inflorescence development. Changes in dry weight and leaf area were reported by Petrie, Watson & Ward (32), and changes in nitrogen content by Watson & Petrie (49). In all of this work the significance of relationships at higher levels of organisation of the plant body was stressed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 50%
“…This was clearly recognized in ontogenetic studies of wheat and Sudan grass by Ballard and Petrie (1936) and Petrie (1937), of oats by Williams (1936Williams ( , 1938Williams ( , 1948, of tobacco by Petrie, Watson, and Ward (1939), Watson and Petrie (1940), and Petrie and Arthur (1943), of flax by Tiver (1942), and of linseed by Tiver and Williams (1943). More recently, studies on similar lines have been made for barley and rye by Williams and Shapter (1955) and for the tomato plant by Gates (1955aGates ( , 1955bGates ( , 1957.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The extraction of general principles relevant to the physiology of growth from complex sets of data such as the above is not easy, and has been attended by only partial success when attempted by Watson and Petrie (1940) and by Williams (1955). Perhaps the most significant positive contribution has been their emphasis upon competitive demand within the plants for metabolites and nutrients alike.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…o Each organ thus has a certain capacity to accumulate nutrients such as phosphorus, and in its senescent phase it constitutes a potential source of these nutrients for younger plant parts. That the demand of younger organs for nitrogen must be regar<ied as the main factor causing loss of nitrogen from mature leaves has been suggested for barley by Walkley (1940), and for tobacco by Watson and Petrie (1940), and it is probable that export of phosphorus is initiated in the same way. At the same time, the demand of each organ for phosphorus is usually met in part, if not entirely, by absorption from the external medium; this rate of intake by the roots, however, is restricted to the extent that phosphorus is more readily available within the plant itself.…”
Section: (I) the Internal Or Growth Factormentioning
confidence: 99%