2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiological reactivity and different forms of aggression in girls: Moderating roles of rejection sensitivity and peer rejection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
61
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
12
61
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although these findings were unexpected, they are consistent with an emerging line of theory and research suggesting that some aggressive individuals may engage in aggression in the absence of emotional arousal, particularly when the function of aggression is instrumental in nature (e.g., to gain a desired resource; Frick and Morris 2004). These findings are also consistent with a recent psychophysiological study indicating that low levels of autonomic reactivity to relational provocation (which some researchers have argued reflect a physiological assessment of anger; see Hubbard et al 2002) are associated with relational aggression among girls (Sijtsema et al 2011). It is possible that these victimized girls with low levels of emotional sensitivity may be particularly likely to engage in proactive, rather than reactive functions, of aggressive conduct (see Step Hubbard et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Although these findings were unexpected, they are consistent with an emerging line of theory and research suggesting that some aggressive individuals may engage in aggression in the absence of emotional arousal, particularly when the function of aggression is instrumental in nature (e.g., to gain a desired resource; Frick and Morris 2004). These findings are also consistent with a recent psychophysiological study indicating that low levels of autonomic reactivity to relational provocation (which some researchers have argued reflect a physiological assessment of anger; see Hubbard et al 2002) are associated with relational aggression among girls (Sijtsema et al 2011). It is possible that these victimized girls with low levels of emotional sensitivity may be particularly likely to engage in proactive, rather than reactive functions, of aggressive conduct (see Step Hubbard et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Thus, despite similar mean RSA levels during the pre-task and peer-evaluative periods, considerable variability was observed in preadolescents' RSAR responses to the lab protocol. RSAR and SCLR were not correlated which is consistent with other studies (e.g., Sijtsema et al 2011). Two values were considered possible outliers for RSAR based on their deviation from the mean (+/− 3 SDs).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In turn, empirical studies associating both PNS and SNS reactivity to antisocial behavior showed thatreactivity of both branches of the ANS has been cross-sectionallyassociated with more antisocial behavior (i.e., aggression and externalizing behaviors) in children and adolescents (Beauchaine, Gatzke-Kopp, & Mead, 2007;Boyce et al, 2001;Calkins, Graziano, & Keane, 2007;Sijtsema, Shoulberg, & Murray-Close, 2011).…”
Section: Perinatal Adversities and Antisocial Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%