2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00468-020-01965-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiological response of Pinus taeda L. trees to stem inoculation with Leptographium terebrantis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Leptographium terebrantis inoculation did not negatively influence foliage moisture content relative to uninoculated trees to induce moisture stress in the young loblolly pine trees. Previously, Mensah et al (2020) noted that L . terebrantis inoculation did not cause moisture stress on young loblolly pine trees by 24 weeks after infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leptographium terebrantis inoculation did not negatively influence foliage moisture content relative to uninoculated trees to induce moisture stress in the young loblolly pine trees. Previously, Mensah et al (2020) noted that L . terebrantis inoculation did not cause moisture stress on young loblolly pine trees by 24 weeks after infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using direct X-ray microCT imaging in esca symptomatic stems, we found that hydraulic conductivity loss was almost entirely associated with the presence of tyloses. Different studies have investigated the link between vascular pathogen development and hydraulic conductivity in stems (Collins et al ., 2009; Lachenbruch and Zhao, 2019; Mensah et al ., 2020). During biotic stresses, air embolisms have been shown to decrease hydraulic conductivity during bacterial leaf scorch disease (McElrone et al ., 2003; 2008), Pierce’s disease (Pérez-Donoso et al ., 2016), and Pine wilt disease (Yazaki et al ., 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the case regarding the susceptibility of different species or varieties to specific pathogens (Jacobi & MacDonald, 1980;Ouellette et al, 1999;Clerivet et al, 2000;Et-Touil et al, 2005;Venturas et al, 2014;Park & Juzwik 2014;Rioux et al, 2018), in particular to Phaeomoniella chlamydospora, one of the pathogen associated with esca (Pouzoulet et al, 2017;. (ii) In other studies, it has been shown that tyloses can exacerbate symptoms (Talboys, 1972): they cause a reduction in stem hydraulic conductivity, sometimes associated with a reduction in stomatal conductance in leaves and, in the most severe cases, wilting (Parke et al, 2007;Beier et al, 2017;Lachenbruch & Zhao, 2019, Mensah et al, 2020Sun et al, 2013;Deyett et al, 2019 during Pierce's disease). Our results suggest that during esca (i) the development of tyloses in stems cannot be interpreted as a systematic trait of pathogen resistance because visual symptoms were observed despite the presence of tyloses and they were produced at a distance from pathogens.…”
Section: Hydraulic Conductivity Tyloses and Vessel Anatomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using direct X-ray microCT imaging in esca symptomatic stems, we found that hydraulic conductivity loss was almost entirely associated with the presence of tyloses. Different studies have investigated the link between vascular pathogen development and hydraulic conductivity in stems (Collins et al, 2009;Lachenbruch and Zhao, 2019;Mensah et al, 2020). During biotic stresses, air embolisms have been shown to decrease hydraulic conductivity during bacterial leaf scorch disease (McElrone et al, 2003;, Pierce's disease (Pérez-Donoso et al, 2016), and Pine wilt disease (Yazaki et al, 2018).…”
Section: In Vivo Xylem Integrity Observations and Hydraulic Vulnerability Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of fungal wilt diseases, the hydraulic conductivity loss was associated with nongaseous embolism (i.e. tyloses) at the point of pathogen inoculation (Guerard et al, 2000;Sallé et al, 2008;Beier et al, 2017;Mensah et al, 2020), or with canker presence in naturally infected stems (Lachenbruch and Zhao, 2019).…”
Section: In Vivo Xylem Integrity Observations and Hydraulic Vulnerability Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%