2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-28643-1_52
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiological Response to Games and Non-games: A Contrastive Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To analyze the log files, we extracted the self-ratings and the physiological data 2 which go with them and found out: (1) The self-ratings for playing are concentrated in q1 (positive, arousing); (2) The self-ratings for writing are concentrated in the middle of the coordinate system (neutral emotional and physical arousal); and (3) Physiological data 3 show a medial value of heart rate and stress level during playing and high values during writing [5]. Indeed the felt arousal in interaction with a computer game found no expression in these.…”
Section: Identification Of Affective Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To analyze the log files, we extracted the self-ratings and the physiological data 2 which go with them and found out: (1) The self-ratings for playing are concentrated in q1 (positive, arousing); (2) The self-ratings for writing are concentrated in the middle of the coordinate system (neutral emotional and physical arousal); and (3) Physiological data 3 show a medial value of heart rate and stress level during playing and high values during writing [5]. Indeed the felt arousal in interaction with a computer game found no expression in these.…”
Section: Identification Of Affective Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%