2016
DOI: 10.1080/15389588.2016.1227073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiological signal analysis for fatigue level of experienced and inexperienced drivers

Abstract: We found that in a monotonous road environment, fatigue symptoms occurred in inexperienced drivers and experienced drivers after about 60 and 80 min of continuous driving, respectively. Therefore, as for drivers with different experiences, restriction on continuous driving time would avoid fatigued driving and thereby eliminate traffic accidents. We find that the comprehensive indicator changes significantly with fatigue level. The integration of different indicators improves the recognition accuracy of differ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The vehicle seat and wheel positions were adjusted to ensure that the drivers were in their most comfortable driving positions. All experimental equipment, including the EEG, car music player and eye tracker, was adjusted accordingly.Procedure 2: Each driver first drove for 80 min without music (Li et al., 2017) and then drove for 60 min while listening to a selected music tempo at a volume of 65 dB (or in silence for the no-music condition). The driver’s body data started recording at the 75-min mark and then were tracked every 5 min until the end of the experiment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The vehicle seat and wheel positions were adjusted to ensure that the drivers were in their most comfortable driving positions. All experimental equipment, including the EEG, car music player and eye tracker, was adjusted accordingly.Procedure 2: Each driver first drove for 80 min without music (Li et al., 2017) and then drove for 60 min while listening to a selected music tempo at a volume of 65 dB (or in silence for the no-music condition). The driver’s body data started recording at the 75-min mark and then were tracked every 5 min until the end of the experiment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To eliminate the impact of the music sequence, we used a Latin square sampling method to differently order the music tempos for each driver, aiming to examine how music affects fatigue during prolonged driving. Because the safe limit for monotonous highway driving is 80 min (Li, Su, & Lu, 2017), each driver was asked to drive for 80 min without music, thereby reaching a certain level of tiredness; then, they listened to the music of a certain tempo (or continued in silence for the no-music condition) for 60 min. The driver's physiological indices were continuously recorded.…”
Section: Experimental Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address those problems, recent works have proposed to employ information obtained from the driver (Paul et al, 2016 ). For example, driver's face images has been used to recognize distractions (Sigari et al, 2013 ; Fernández et al, 2016 ) or drowsiness (Liu and Salvucci, 2001 ) while physiological activity has been employed to detect fatigue (Li et al, 2017a ) or drowsiness (Sahayadhas et al, 2012 ; lan Chen et al, 2015 ). The final aim in these approaches is to detect potential danger situations originated by human errors while driving (Janssen, 2001 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of EEG signals, the undesired artifacts such as eye blinking were reduced by using independent component analysis (ICA) in the EEGLAB software. The subjective fatigue level of participants was investigated before and after the real driving experiments by the Stanford Sleepiness Scale (SSS) [21] (1-2 = conscious, 3-4 = slight fatigue, 5 = medium fatigue, 6-7 = severe fatigue). The facial video was recorded using a video camera installed in front of the participants.…”
Section: Task and Eeg Datamentioning
confidence: 99%