1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3999(96)00240-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiological stress reactivity and recovery: Conceptual siblings separated at birth?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
330
1
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 358 publications
(342 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
10
330
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A slow return to baseline after an emotional experience may undermine health through chronic arousal and is indeed prominent in mental disorders (cf. [47][48][49]. Based on these systematic reviews, and on our specific prediction of differential categories of short-lasting (within a day) and longlasting (across one or more nights) distress, we generated questions to cover this range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A slow return to baseline after an emotional experience may undermine health through chronic arousal and is indeed prominent in mental disorders (cf. [47][48][49]. Based on these systematic reviews, and on our specific prediction of differential categories of short-lasting (within a day) and longlasting (across one or more nights) distress, we generated questions to cover this range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 The stress test recovery time has been investigated poorly. In the present study, postrecovery changes of BP during an SI were significantly lower in subjects who developed SH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We propose a new method to assess recovery by measuring the time until the person has returned to his or her baseline level. Thus, we argue that recovery is not merely an automatic "return to baseline" but is a process of its own that can be subject to affect regulation and can predict health outcomes (Davidson, 1998;Larsen & Christenfeld, 2011;Linden, Earle, Gerin, & Christenfeld, 1997;Nishime et al, 2000). In this article, we first review the available evidence on age differences in reactivity and recovery regarding both subjective affective experiences and heart rate-two central affect components that have been studied most often and that are central for psychological and physiological health (Charles & Carstensen, 2010;Cohen et al, 2000;Steptoe, Dockray, & Wardle, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%