1998
DOI: 10.1007/bf01280872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiological, structural, and immunological characterization of leaf and chloroplast development in cotton

Abstract: Summary.Many of the studies of chloroplast ontogeny in higher plants have utilized suboptimal conditions of light and growth to assess development. In this study, we utilized structural, immunological, and physiological techniques to examine the development of the chloroplast in fieldgrown cotton (Gossypium hirsutum cv. "MD 51 ne"). Our youngest leaf sample developmentally was completely folded upon itself and about 0.5 cm in length; leaves of this same plastochron were followed for three weeks to the fully ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Immature leaves are vulnerable to stresses from high solar radiation, caused by several internal factors which include underdeveloped chloroplasts (Pettigrew and Vaughn 1998;Choinski et al 2003) and low photosynthetic enzyme activities (Miranda et al 1981;Pettigrew and Vaughn 1998). Therefore, numerous strategies, including elevated xanthophyll cycle pigments (Krause et al 1995;Barker et al 1997), reduced chlorophyll concentrations (Choinski et al 2003;Cai et al 2005) and elevated anthocyanin as a light dissipation pigment (Manetas et al 2002;Karageorgou and Manetas 2006;Liakopoulos et al 2006) are apparent in juvenile leaves to avoid photoinhibition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Immature leaves are vulnerable to stresses from high solar radiation, caused by several internal factors which include underdeveloped chloroplasts (Pettigrew and Vaughn 1998;Choinski et al 2003) and low photosynthetic enzyme activities (Miranda et al 1981;Pettigrew and Vaughn 1998). Therefore, numerous strategies, including elevated xanthophyll cycle pigments (Krause et al 1995;Barker et al 1997), reduced chlorophyll concentrations (Choinski et al 2003;Cai et al 2005) and elevated anthocyanin as a light dissipation pigment (Manetas et al 2002;Karageorgou and Manetas 2006;Liakopoulos et al 2006) are apparent in juvenile leaves to avoid photoinhibition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Samples of young leaf tissue were prepared for microscopy as described by Pettigrew and Vaughn (1998).…”
Section: Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) as well as new chlorophyll synthesis (Hughes et al 2007). The decrease in chlorophyll a/b ratios during leaf expansion (IME compared with IM) has been observed in other species exhibiting green developing leaves (Hughes et al 2007, Manetas et al 2003 and was probably because the chloroplasts in young leaves have underdeveloped thylakoids (Choinski & Wise 1999) with higher amounts of PSII relative to PSI (Pettigrew & Vaughn 1998). The carotenoid/ chlorophyll ratio also decreased during leaf expansion (Table 1), consistent with most (Barker et al 1997;Hughes et al 2007;Krause et al 1995), although not all previous studies (Manetas et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%