2013
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.4129-12.2013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiologically Inspired Model for the Visual Recognition of Transitive Hand Actions

Abstract: The visual recognition of actions is an important visual function that is critical for motor learning and social communication. Actionselective neurons have been found in different cortical regions, including the superior temporal sulcus, parietal and premotor cortex. Among those are mirror neurons, which link visual and motor representations of body movements. While numerous theoretical models for the mirror neuron system have been proposed, the computational basis of the visual processing of goal-directed ac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 161 publications
3
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This requires a modeling of additional computations, potentially realized parietal areas that analyze the shape and position of goal objects and the relationship between object and the effector movements. One model of this type reproduces a variety of electrophysiological results from action-selective neurons in the STS and premotor area F5, at the same time accomplishing recognition from real videos (Fleischer et al, 2013) (see Figure 2B). This model reproduces, for example, the view dependence of action-selective neurons (see ''Some Newly Established Properties of Mirror Neurons in Area F5''), their temporal sequence selectivity, and predicts a relationship between mirror neurons and mechanisms for causality perception (Fleischer et al, 2012).…”
Section: Example-based Visual Recognition Modelsmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This requires a modeling of additional computations, potentially realized parietal areas that analyze the shape and position of goal objects and the relationship between object and the effector movements. One model of this type reproduces a variety of electrophysiological results from action-selective neurons in the STS and premotor area F5, at the same time accomplishing recognition from real videos (Fleischer et al, 2013) (see Figure 2B). This model reproduces, for example, the view dependence of action-selective neurons (see ''Some Newly Established Properties of Mirror Neurons in Area F5''), their temporal sequence selectivity, and predicts a relationship between mirror neurons and mechanisms for causality perception (Fleischer et al, 2012).…”
Section: Example-based Visual Recognition Modelsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…It comprises three modules: (a) shape recognition hierarchy that recognizes hand and object shapes; (b) ''affordance module'' that analyzes the matching between grip type and objects shape and their spatial parameters; (c) recognition module that consists of neurons that are selective for goal-directed hand actions. View independence is generated at the highest level of the hierarchy by pooling the output signals from viewspecific modules (modified from Fleischer et al, 2013).…”
Section: Dynamic Recurrent Neural Network and Neural Field Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our data are consistent with a role for AIP in the mirror neuron network (Nelissen et al, 2011;Rizzolatti & Sinigaglia, 2010;Oztop & Arbib, 2002) but do not permit to decide whether GO activity in AIP is in fact related to the mirror neuron system or to action recognition in general. Future studies should test whether GO activity in AIP constitutes an early stage in which the mapping between visual and motor properties occurs to provide input for cortical areas involved in the recognition of biological actions and/or mirror activity (Fleischer, Caggiano, Thier, & Giese, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The visual recognition of social interactions is, therefore, critical for humans to navigate through both their physical and social environment. So far, prominent theories of action recognition assume that during action recognition the physical pattern of an action is associated with one particular action interpretation (e.g., Fleischer, Caggiano, Thier, & Giese, 2013;Giese & Poggio, 2003;Rizzolatti, Fogassi, & Gallese, 2001). Here we examine whether humans associate different semantic interpretations with the same action.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%