2023
DOI: 10.3390/horticulturae9111163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phytochemical Profile and Biological Activities of Extracts Obtained from Young Shoots of Blackcurrant (Ribes nigrum L.), European Blueberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.), and Mountain Cranberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.)

Maria-Beatrice Solcan,
Ionel Fizeșan,
Laurian Vlase
et al.

Abstract: This study explores the bioactive potential of young shoots from blackcurrant, European blueberry, and mountain cranberry, widely employed in gemmotherapy and phytotherapy, as rich sources of antioxidants, antimicrobial agents, and anti-inflammatory components. The primary aims of this study were to enhance the extraction conditions for bioactive compounds from blackcurrant young shoots using Modde software for experimental design, to conduct a comprehensive phytochemical analysis of blackcurrant, European blu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 84 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Like R 2 , a higher Q 2 value suggests better predictive ability as it is an Life 2024, 14, 84 9 of 17 indicator of how good the model is expected to perform on external or validation datasets. Q 2 should be close to R 2 (<0.3 difference between them), indicating that the model not only fits the experimental data well but also has good predictive power [36]. As indicated by the results given in Table 5, significant models (p < 0.05) were developed for all responses because there is a statistically significant difference between the percentage of variation that can be explained and the percentage of variation that cannot be modeled.…”
Section: Outcomes Of Fitting the Data With The Modelsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Like R 2 , a higher Q 2 value suggests better predictive ability as it is an Life 2024, 14, 84 9 of 17 indicator of how good the model is expected to perform on external or validation datasets. Q 2 should be close to R 2 (<0.3 difference between them), indicating that the model not only fits the experimental data well but also has good predictive power [36]. As indicated by the results given in Table 5, significant models (p < 0.05) were developed for all responses because there is a statistically significant difference between the percentage of variation that can be explained and the percentage of variation that cannot be modeled.…”
Section: Outcomes Of Fitting the Data With The Modelsmentioning
confidence: 78%