2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10812-020-00944-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phytoplankton Bloom and Photosynthetically Active Radiation in Coastal Waters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The spectral downwelling irradiance (Ed(λ)) was calculated based on measured (aph(λ)), (aNAP(λ)) and (aCDOM(λ)) 11 . Spectral features of Ed(λ) are characterized by wavelength of the maximum of spectral downwelling irradiance (λmax), calculated as the middle of the wavelength range corresponding to half the value of the maximum irradiance 12 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spectral downwelling irradiance (Ed(λ)) was calculated based on measured (aph(λ)), (aNAP(λ)) and (aCDOM(λ)) 11 . Spectral features of Ed(λ) are characterized by wavelength of the maximum of spectral downwelling irradiance (λmax), calculated as the middle of the wavelength range corresponding to half the value of the maximum irradiance 12 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…About 44% of the incident solar radiation within the wavelength range 400-700 nm at the sea surface is photosynthetically active (Churilova et al, 2020). Following previous studies (Brewin et al, 2011;Devred et al, 2011;Roy et al, 2013;Varunan & Shanmugam, 2015), we estimate the total a ph (λ) between 400 and 700 nm using a linear combination of the absorption contributions by different phytoplankton size groups, including the pico-(size: <2 μm), nano-(2-20 μm), and micro-phytoplankton (>20 μm) groups:…”
Section: Bio-optical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…About 44% of the incident solar radiation within the wavelength range 400–700 nm at the sea surface is photosynthetically active (Churilova et al., 2020). Following previous studies (Brewin et al., 2011; Devred et al., 2011; Roy et al., 2013; Varunan & Shanmugam, 2015), we estimate the total a ph ( λ ) between 400 and 700 nm using a linear combination of the absorption contributions by different phytoplankton size groups, including the pico‐ (size: <2 μm), nano‐ (2–20 μm), and micro‐phytoplankton (>20 μm) groups: aph(λ)=P(λ)CP+N(λ)CN+M(λ)CM, where P* ( λ ), N* ( λ ), and M* ( λ ) are the size‐specific absorption coefficients of pico‐, nano‐, and micro‐phytoplankton, respectively; and C P , C N , and C M are the corresponding chlorophyll concentrations, expressed as a function of the total chlorophyll concentration (chl) (Brewin et al., 2017).…”
Section: The Formulation Of the Osa Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, this leads to an incorrect estimate of the phytoplankton biomass, primary production and growth rate of plankton microalgae [27,28]. The aCDM-s(443) values are higher than the aph-s (443) values (2.2 times on average), and the aph-s (443) values are lower than the aph-i (443) (9 times on average) throughout the year, leading to an incorrect result of calculating the relative contribution of phytoplankton and non-algal particles of optically active substances in the medium (CDOM and NAP), and, consequently, to an error in determining the optical properties of waters, in particular transparency, spectral properties of quantum irradiation penetrating into the water column [4,24,29] and photosynthetic potential of microalgae [30][31][32].…”
Section: F I Gmentioning
confidence: 99%