2011
DOI: 10.4319/lo.2011.56.6.1959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phytoplankton communities and stoichiometry are interactively affected by light, nutrients, and fish

Abstract: We examined the separate and interactive effects of light, nutrients, and zooplanktivorous fish on phytoplankton nutrient stoichiometry, taxonomic richness, community composition, and the associations among these variables. We manipulated light supply, nutrient supply, and zooplanktivorous fish (presence or absence), in a factorial design using mesocosms containing regional phytoplankton and zooplankton assemblages. C : N and C : P were highest under high nutrients and high light. We observed interactive effec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(77 reference statements)
2
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The present findings are corroborated by results reported by Degefu et al (2011), Mette et al (2011), Ssanyu et al (2011) and Shahabuddin et al (2012). The results further showed statistically comparable phytoplankton biomass and abundance between the ponds under MI and RB treatments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The present findings are corroborated by results reported by Degefu et al (2011), Mette et al (2011), Ssanyu et al (2011) and Shahabuddin et al (2012). The results further showed statistically comparable phytoplankton biomass and abundance between the ponds under MI and RB treatments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Furthermore, whereas for most fish species, biomass-standardised excretion rate tends to decrease with increasing fish mass (i.e. All these potential effects of diversity in fish nutrient excretion rates and community structure on nutrient recycling need to be experimentally tested using in situ (Taylor, Flecker & Hall, 2006;Schaus et al, 2010) or mesocosm experiments (Kohler et al, 2011;Mette et al, 2011), or modelling approaches (Tarvainen et al, 2002;McIntyre et al, 2007). More importantly, few species showed an increasing biomass-standardised excretion rate with fish mass (i.e.…”
Section: Nutrient Recycling By European Fish 2337mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Food chain efficiency (FCE), i.e. In aquatic ecosystems, primary production, algal stoichiometry and species composition, and hence energy flow to higher trophic levels, are often constrained by light and/or nutrient supply (Sterner et al, 1997;Urabe et al, 2002;Dickman et al, 2008;van de Waal et al, 2010;Mette et al, 2011;Rowland et al, 2015), thus it is important to understand how these environmental drivers may impact FCE. In aquatic ecosystems, primary production, algal stoichiometry and species composition, and hence energy flow to higher trophic levels, are often constrained by light and/or nutrient supply (Sterner et al, 1997;Urabe et al, 2002;Dickman et al, 2008;van de Waal et al, 2010;Mette et al, 2011;Rowland et al, 2015), thus it is important to understand how these environmental drivers may impact FCE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%