Phytoplankton size structure in transitional water ecosystems: a comparative analysis of descriptive tools

Abstract

ABSTRACT1. Individual size has important implications for the physiology and ecology of phytoplankton. The analysis of size structure is a common approach for studying structure and function of planktonic ecosystems, with applications for the monitoring and conservation of aquatic ecosystem health. Several ways to describe the size structure of phytoplankton communities are used, including size-abundance relationships (SAR), nonnormalized and normalized biomass size spectra (BSS), non-normalized and normalized number size spectra (NSS).2. The main goal of this study was to test the effectiveness of the different tools proposed for describing and monitoring phytoplankton guilds in transitional waters. Comparative analyses were undertaken to evaluate (a) the consistency of each tool in describing the phytoplankton guilds, in terms of statistical significance and agreement with theoretical expectations; and (b) the effectiveness of each tool to discriminate conditions/cases.3. Eleven transitional water bodies occurring along the eastern and western coasts of the Adriatic Basin were sampled in autumn 2004 and spring 2005. 4. Results obtained highlight that: (1) NSS globally showed higher statistical goodness of fit than BSS; (2) slopes of BSS and NSS, both normalized and non-normalized, were less negative than expected following the linear biomass hypothesis; and (3) the non-normalized NSS shape descriptors were best able to discriminate environmental heterogeneity both between and within transitional water ecosystems.5. Parameters of NSS are suggested to be consistent descriptors of phytoplankton size structure and potentially important tools for monitoring and conservation of transitional water ecosystems.

Application of phytoplankton community structure for ranking the major riverine catchments influencing the pollution status of a lake basin

“…Such factors necessitate the need for a multi-metric index incorporating various phytoplankton, morphology and physicochemical attributes that can affect phytoplankton occurrence in riverine systems, in order to obtain a comparative assessment of nutrient load impacts. Notably, the current study would add to the literature of other studies that have indicated how the abundance distribution of the phytoplankton communities can vary significantly in relation to human-generated or environmental forcings (Sabetta et al 2008).…”

Decoding Size Distribution Patterns in Marine and Transitional Water Phytoplankton: From Community to Species Level

“…The Southern Adriatic/Eastern Ionian area is characterized by oligotrophic conditions and low primary productivity. Nutrient supply to the shelf area strongly depends on inputs of surface waters along the coast (which in the Salento Peninsula are more abundant in the Northern part) as well as on inputs of groundwater [ 52 ]. A superficial southward coastal current flowing from the Northern Adriatic basin and a deep north-westward current flowing from the Eastern Mediterranean (Levantine Intermediate Waters, LIW) also contribute to nutrient supply in the shelf area, although their influence on the Southern Adriatic basin is generally limited, on both temporal and spatial scales [ 53 ].…”

Pelagic habitats in the Mediterranean Sea: A review of Good Environmental Status (GES) determination for plankton components and identification of gaps and priority needs to improve coherence for the MSFD implementation

“…In the frame of the WISER and ActionMed projects, (Lugoli et al, 2012;Sabetta et al, 2008;Vadrucci et al, 2013), minimising the problem of taxonomic expertise required, and allowing quantitative inter-calibration procedures (Carvalho et al, 2013).…”