Phytoremediation of volatile organic compounds by indoor plants: a review

Pettit

et al. 2019

Environ Sci Pollut Res

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are of public concern due to their adverse health effects. Botanical air filtration is a promising technology for reducing indoor air contaminants, but the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. This study assessed active botanical biofilters for their single-pass removal efficiency (SPRE) for benzene, ethyl acetate and ambient total volatile organic compounds (TVOC)s, at concentrations of in situ relevance. Biofilters containing four plant species (Chlorophytum orchidastrum, Nematanthus glabra, Nephrolepis cordifolia 'duffii' and Schefflera arboricola) were compared to discern whether plant selection influenced VOC SPRE. Amongst all tested plant species, benzene SPREs were between 45.54-59.50%, with N. glabra the most efficient. The botanical biofilters removed 32.36-91.19% of ethyl acetate, with C. orchidastrum and S. arboricola recording significantly higher ethyl acetate SPREs than N. glabra and N. cordifolia. These findings thus indicate that plant type influences botanical biofilter VOC removal. It is proposed that ethyl acetate SPREs were dependent on hydrophilic adsorbent sites, with increasing root surface area, root diameter and root mass all associated with increasing ethyl acetate SPRE. The high benzene SPRE of N. glabra is likely due to the high wax content in its leaf cuticles. The SPREs for the relatively low levels of ambient TVOCs were consistent amongst plant species, providing no evidence to suggest that in situ TVOC removal is influenced by plant choice. Nonetheless, as inter-species differences do exist for some VOCs, botanical biofilters using a mixture of plants is proposed. Keywords Air pollution; botanical biofilters; phytoremediation; green walls; VOCs 'active green walls', which utilise mechanical assistance to funnel air into the biofilter substrate, improves their bioremediation efficiency to the extent that functional air remediation is probable (Torpy et al. 2015). These systems may also be practical for large infrastructure use, given that they are accessible, robust, cost-effective and have a low-energy footprint. Although the available types of botanical biofiltration systems differ in design, they all use active airflow facilitated with devices such as impellers that increase the airflow across or through the systems and therefore allow larger volumes of air to be processed by the biofilter. Whilst there is a growing body of literature that demonstrates the air pollutant remediation capabilities of this technology (Pettit et al. 2019), to date, the potential for plant selection to enhance botanical biofilters ability to filter some of the more dangerous air pollutants is required. Plant selection is known to have an influence on VOC removal efficiency for static, potted-plant systems (e.g. Kim et al. 2010). Whilst the nature of the plant characteristics that determine these effects have yet to be resolved, there may be phylogenetic associations where certain groups of plants are more effective for the removal of certain forms of VOC (Ki...

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Does plant species selection in functional active green walls influence VOC phytoremediation efficiency?

Pettit

et al. 2019

Environ Sci Pollut Res

J. People Plants Environ

“…As over 80% of people living in this modern society spend most of their time in indoor spaces, the importance of indoor air quality as well as outdoor air quality has also increased recently (Firdaus and Ahmad, 2011;Kim et al, 2018). The level of PM in the indoor air increases as PM generated in outdoor spaces moves into indoor spaces or as PM emitted from indoor pollution sources (Pettit et al,552•Journal of People, Plants, and Environment Vol.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Impact of the Morphological Characteristics of Leaves on Particulate Matter Removal Efficiency of Plants

Son

Jeong

Yun

et al. 2019

Self Cite

This study was conducted to find out differences in the removal efficiency of particulate matter (PM) depending on the type of plants and the morphological characteristics of leaves. A total of 12 plants were used, with three plants selected for each type of leaves (big leaf, small leaf, compound leaf, needle leaf). We measured the removed amount of PM10 and PM2.5, the structure of the abaxial leaf surface, and the weight of the wax layer of each plant. Plants with the high removal efficiency of PM included Pachira aquatica Aubl., Ardisia crenata, and Dieffenbachia 'Marianne', and plants with the low removal efficiency included Nandina domestica Thunb, Schefflera arboricola, and Quercus dentata. The abaxial leaf surface having a high removal efficiency of PM had many large wrinkles, and the abaxial leaf surface having a medium removal efficiency was flat and smooth. On the other hand, there were many fine hairs on the abaxial leaf surface with a low removal efficiency. According to the plant leaf type, the PM10 removal efficiency of plants with needle leaves was about three times higher than that of other plants. In particular, the wax layer of conifers weighed 6-24 times higher than those of other plants. The stomata of conifers were evenly distributed on the adaxial and abaxial leaf surfaces; however, the stomata of Sciadopitys verticillata appeared in the form of papillae unlike general stomata. Therefore, the removal efficiency of PM varied depending on the macro-, and micro-morphological characteristics of plant leaves such as the structure of the abaxial leaf surface, and the weight of the wax layer. Based on this research, selecting plants that are effective in reducing PM in consideration of the plant type and leaf characteristics will improve indoor air quality and decrease exposure of PM to human body.

J. People Plants Environ

“…see Torpy et al, 2015), all of these methods are expensive, limited in the number of pollutants they can remove, and require energy to run. Utilising biological processes for air pollutant removal thus has considerable potential if cost-effective and safe systems with adequate efficiency can be developed (Kim et al, 2018).…”

Section: Air Quality Bioremediationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Applied Horticultural Biotechnology for the Mitigation of Indoor Air Pollution

Torpy¹,

Pettit²,

Irga³

2018

Exposure to indoor air pollution is an emerging worldwide problem, with growing evidence that it is a major cause of morbidity worldwide. Whilst most indoor air pollutants are of outdoor origin, these combine with a range of indoor sourced pollutants that may lead to high pollutant levels indoors. The pollutants of greatest concern are volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and particulate matter (PM), both of which are associated with a range of serious health problems. Whilst current buildings usually use ventilation with outdoor air to remove these pollutants, botanical systems are gaining recognition as an effective alternative. Whilst many years research has shown that traditional potted plants and their substrates are capable of removing VOCs effectively, they are inefficient at removing PM, and are limited in their pollutant removal rates by the need for pollutants to diffuse to the active pollutant removal components of these systems. Active botanical biofiltration, using green wall systems combined with mechanical fans to increase pollutant exposure to the plants and substrate, show greatly increased rates of pollutant removal for both VOCs, PM and also carbon dioxide (CO 2). A developing body of research indicates that these systems can outperform existing technologies for indoor air pollutant removal, although further research is required before their use will become widespread. Whilst it is known that plant species selection and substrate characteristics can affect the performance of active botanical systems, optimal characteristics are yet to be identified. Once this research has been completed, it is proposed that active botanical biofiltration will provide a cheap and low energy use alternative to mechanical ventilations systems for the maintenance of indoor environmental quality.