2013
DOI: 10.1080/15226514.2012.760521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phytotechnologies – Preventing Exposures, Improving Public Health

Abstract: Phytotechnologies have the potential to reduce the amount and/or toxicity of deleterious chemicals/agents, and thereby, prevent human exposures to hazardous substances. As such, phytotechnologies are a tool for primary prevention within the context of public health. Research advances demonstrate that phytotechnologies can be uniquely tailored for effective exposure prevention for a variety of applications. In addition to exposure prevention, phytotechnologists have advanced the use of plants as sensors to deli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Positive publicity, habitat restoration, low secondary waste, preservation of substrate fertility, and reduced cost are often advantages of phytoremediation over conventional methods. The disadvantages may include a long timescale, limited root depth, plant's vulnerabilities to toxins, variation in success based on local conditions, problematic determination of toxic biodegradation products (Wicker et al 2010), and transfer of contaminants to the food chain (Schwitzguébel 2001;Susarla et al 2002;Green and Hoffnagle 2004;Vagronsveld et al 2009;Ouvrard 2011;Samardjieva 2011;Schwitzguébel et al 2011;Mench et al 2010;Henry et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Positive publicity, habitat restoration, low secondary waste, preservation of substrate fertility, and reduced cost are often advantages of phytoremediation over conventional methods. The disadvantages may include a long timescale, limited root depth, plant's vulnerabilities to toxins, variation in success based on local conditions, problematic determination of toxic biodegradation products (Wicker et al 2010), and transfer of contaminants to the food chain (Schwitzguébel 2001;Susarla et al 2002;Green and Hoffnagle 2004;Vagronsveld et al 2009;Ouvrard 2011;Samardjieva 2011;Schwitzguébel et al 2011;Mench et al 2010;Henry et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In legacy sites, mine tailings particulates often have associated metal(loid) contaminants because extraction technologies 50 – 100 years ago were not as efficient as those used in modern mining operations. Human health risks arising from dispersion of metal(loid)-containing particulates from legacy sites can result from various routes of exposure including inhalation of particles transported by wind and ingestion of contaminated soil (particularly for children) or food due to the deposition of wind- or water-borne particles onto soil or garden vegetables (Csavina et al, 2011; Henry et al, 2013; Mendez and Maier, 2008; Ramirez-Andreotta et al, 2013). …”
Section: 0 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vegetative cap created by assisted phytostabilization should result in the phyto-catalyzed stabilization of inorganic contaminants in the root zone driven by organic matter, plant root exudates and the associated rhizosphere microbial community (Mendez and Maier, 2008; Santibañez et al, 2012). Further, there should be limited above ground biomass accumulation of metal(loid)s to prevent the movement of contaminants into the surrounding ecosystem and food chain through grazing or plant death and decay (Henry et al, 2013; Mendez and Maier, 2008; Pérez-de-Mora et al, 2011). …”
Section: 0 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phytotechnologies may be used to prevent contaminant exposure and, in effect, be a tool for primary prevention in environmental public health [76]. Of particular importance will be studies to determine if the same mechanisms which have been implicated in metal trapping within roots also operate in border cell populations [77].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%