2016 2nd International Conference on Advances in Electrical, Electronics, Information, Communication and Bio-Informatics (AEEIC 2016
DOI: 10.1109/aeeicb.2016.7538274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PI tuning of Shunt Active Filter using GA and PSO algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fig. 1-b is a simple display of shunt active power filters, as it is shown APF is compensating the nonlinear load current by injecting the same nonlinear current that load absorbs from the grid, so that the grid current will be sinusoidal [66,67] Ongoing researches in this field are concentrated over novel control methods of shunt active power filters and also new applications for shunt APFs [68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80]. More detailed analysis of main topologies of shunt active power filters is done in [81].…”
Section: Shunt Active Power Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 1-b is a simple display of shunt active power filters, as it is shown APF is compensating the nonlinear load current by injecting the same nonlinear current that load absorbs from the grid, so that the grid current will be sinusoidal [66,67] Ongoing researches in this field are concentrated over novel control methods of shunt active power filters and also new applications for shunt APFs [68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80]. More detailed analysis of main topologies of shunt active power filters is done in [81].…”
Section: Shunt Active Power Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, when the classical optimization techniques were employed for DC‐bus voltage stabilization, the reduction achieved in peak magnitude and settling time was not sufficient enough. In this context, these methods require particular mention, and they are as follows: (a) bacterial foraging optimization (BFO) 12,13 ; (b) PSO 14‐18 ; (c) Artificial Bee Colony technique 19 ; (d) GSA 20‐24 ; (e) Genetic Algorithm (GA) 21 ; and (f) the authors' approach based on GWO‐PI 25,26 . Particularly, the optimized gain coefficients of PI‐compensator can be achieved in two steps as outlined below: Initially, a proportional and integral gain coefficients K p and K i , respectively, are determined through random approximation. In a second step, random approximations are converged to a minimum value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the large step‐size increases convergence process; however, the accuracy will degrade. On the contrary, the accuracy can be improved with small step‐size, but at the price of the slower convergence process. Recently, the GSA developed by Rashedi et al have attracted significant attention due to its ability to converge faster while providing optimal tuning of PI‐compensator gain coefficients 20‐23 . Further, a method proposed in Reference 24 exploits the property of GSA for parameters tuning of PI‐compensator and employs feed‐forward compensation for enabling adaptive DC‐link voltage control in the grid‐integrated PV system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a paper by Akashkumar et al, the dynamic performance of the systems are Evaluated under different supply conditions and compared with the performances of the working with PI controller [20]. In Gowtham and shobha's paper, they have used a PI controller whose proportional and integral constants are being optimised using genetic and PSO algorithm [21]. In the same control strategy, PI controller was being replaced by fuzzy logic controller to improve the performance of system in a paper by Shuai Hao et al [22].…”
Section: B DC Link Pi Control Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%