Piagetian formal operational tasks: A crossover study of learning effect and reliability

Lawson, Anton E.; Nordland, Floyd H.; DeVito, Alfred

doi:10.1002/sce.3730580216

Cited by 44 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…First, small pre-to posttest improvements have been traced to a test-retest effect (e.g., Lawson, Nordland, & DeVito, 1974). However, our former students' relatively poor performance on quizzes such as the "A" Mountain and Osmosis quiz ( Table 1) strongly suggests that the substantial improvements in hypothesis testing found here are difficult to come by and not likely to have been caused by a test-retest effect.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 69%

Development of Scientific Reasoning in College Biology: Do Two Levels of General Hypothesis-Testing Skills Exist?

Lawson

Clark

Cramer-Meldrum

et al. 2000

J. Res. Sci. Teach.

Self Cite

134

105

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The primary purpose of the present study was to test the hypothesis that two general developmentally based levels of hypothesis-testing skills exist. The first hypothesized level presumably involves skills associated with testing hypotheses about observable causal agents; the second presumably involves skills associated with testing hypotheses involving unobservable entities. To test this hypothesis, a hypothesis-testing skills test was developed and administered to a large sample of college students both at the start and at the end of a biology course in which several hypotheses at each level were generated and tested. The predicted positive relationship between level of hypothesis-testing skill and performance on a transfer problem involving the test of a hypothesis involving unobservable entities was found. The predicted positive relationship between level of hypothesis-testing skill and course performance was also found. Both theoretical and practical implications of the findings are discussed. Following the review of several years of research into problem-solving performance, Perkins and Salomon (1989) concluded that, although expert performance manifests itself in contextualized ways, general cognitive skills (i.e., "habits of mind") exist. These general cognitive skills reveal themselves primarily as strategies of looking for counterexamples to test causal knowledge claims. Although Perkins and Salomon discussed such strategies as thinking tools of the philosopher, scientists recognize them as components of a scientific method that has as its core the generation and test of alternative hypotheses (cf. Baker & Allen, 1977;Burmester, 1952;Carey, 1998;Chamberlain, 1965;Lawson, 1995;Lewis, 1988;Moore, 1993; Platt, 1964). Essentially, this method embodies a set of generally applicable questions that must be raised and satisfactorily answered before drawing a firm conclusion about the relative truth or falsity of any particular causal claim. The set of questions reads more or less like this: What is the central causal question raised in this particular context? In addition to the proposed cause, what al-JOURNAL

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 69%

Development of Scientific Reasoning in College Biology: Do Two Levels of General Hypothesis-Testing Skills Exist?

Lawson

Clark

Cramer-Meldrum

et al. 2000

J. Res. Sci. Teach.

Self Cite

134

105

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Since each interview task has been employed by previous investigators (Lawson, Nordland, & DeVito, 1974) only brief descriptions of the tasks and materials used will be mentioned here.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The development and validation of a classroom test of formal reasoning

1978

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…First, small pre to posttest improvements have been traced to a test-retest effect (e.g., Lawson, Nordland & DeVito, 1974). But our former students' relatively poor performance on 4.…”

Section: Predicting Lecture Exam Scoresmentioning

confidence: 92%

The Neurological Basis of Learning, Development and Discovery

2003

Science &Amp; Technology Education Library

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Piagetian formal operational tasks: A crossover study of learning effect and reliability

Cited by 44 publications

References 7 publications

Development of Scientific Reasoning in College Biology: Do Two Levels of General Hypothesis-Testing Skills Exist?

Development of Scientific Reasoning in College Biology: Do Two Levels of General Hypothesis-Testing Skills Exist?

The development and validation of a classroom test of formal reasoning

The Neurological Basis of Learning, Development and Discovery

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About