2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-4049(02)00145-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Picard groups of derived categories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…REMARK 6.5 The result is the same if one works with bigger derived categories instead of D perf (X). See for instance Fausk's paper [6]. This might look more general than the above Proposition but one should keep in mind that invertible objects in such big categories are necessarily compact, just by abstract non-sense, see [7,Proposition A.2.8] for instance.…”
Section: Lemma 62 An Object a In K Is Invertible If And Only If It Imentioning
confidence: 94%
“…REMARK 6.5 The result is the same if one works with bigger derived categories instead of D perf (X). See for instance Fausk's paper [6]. This might look more general than the above Proposition but one should keep in mind that invertible objects in such big categories are necessarily compact, just by abstract non-sense, see [7,Proposition A.2.8] for instance.…”
Section: Lemma 62 An Object a In K Is Invertible If And Only If It Imentioning
confidence: 94%
“…(i) for the case where R is decomposable. This computation was originally established in [11]. Although Fausk did not use weight structures, one observes that by applying our arguments (see §5) to the triangulated category D c (R), equipped with the weight structure whose heart consists of the finitely generated projective R-modules, one obtains a reasoning somewhat similar to his one.…”
Section: Under Assumptions (B1)-(b2) We Havementioning
confidence: 64%
“…This shows that Pic(M R ) coincides with Pic(R) as defined classically. In fact, for any scheme X, our Pic(sh(X)) is isomorphic to Pic(X) as defined classically [17,II.6.12]; see [10].…”
Section: Proof Since the Functor ( − )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Picard groups of the derived categories D R and of the analogous derived categories of sheaves of modules have been calculated by Fausk [10].…”
Section: Proof Since the Functor ( − )mentioning
confidence: 99%