“…These two locations shouldl ead to different reactiono utcomes because at the oil-water interface the asymmetry,a cidity/basicity,h ydrogen-bonding, and chemical microenvironment are significantly differentf rom those within the bulk water, [33][34][35][36][37][38] which may alter the reaction nature includinga ctivation energy,r eaction rate, and selectivity.I np articular,t he interfacea symmetry in space and polarity may influence the orientation of reactant molecules, likely leading to high selectivity.T he larger oilwater interface area resultsi nt he highers electivity.T his is why the selectivity in the Pickering system is higher than that in . Although Pickeringe mulsion catalysis reactions have been intensively investigated, [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52] this is the first example showing that the stereoselectivity is enhanced at the oil-water interface, which is furtherenhanced by the continuous flow. ChemSusChem 2017ChemSusChem , 10,1989ChemSusChem -1995 www.chemsuschem.org 2017 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH &Co. KGaA, Weinheim conventional biphasic systems( 50.3 vs. 34.8 %f or isopulegol, Figure 3).…”