Picking up the bill - improving health-care utilisation in the Democratic Republic of Congo through user fee subsidisation: a before and after study

Abstract

BackgroundUser fees have been shown to constitute a major barrier to the utilisation of health-care, particularly in low-income countries such as the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Importantly, such barriers can lead to the exclusion of vulnerable individuals from health-care. In 2008, a donor-funded primary health-care programme began implementing user fee subsidisation in 20 health zones of the DRC. In this study, we quantified the short and long-term effects of this policy on health-care utilisation.MethodsSixteen health zones were included for analysis. Using routinely collected health-care utilisation data before and after policy implementation, interrupted time series regression was applied to quantify the temporal impact of the user fee policy in the studied health zones. Payment of salary supplements to health-care workers and provision of free drugs - the other components of the programme - were controlled for where possible.ResultsFourteen (88%) health zones showed an immediate positive effect in health-care utilisation rates (overall median increase of 19%, interquartile range 11 to 43) one month after the policy was introduced, and the effect was significant in seven zones (P <0.05). This initial effect was sustained or increased at 24 months in five health zones but was only significant in one health zone at P <0.05. Utilisation reduced over time in the remaining health zones (overall median increase of 4%, interquartile range −10 to 33). The modelled mean health-care utilisation rate initially increased significantly from 43 consultations/1000 population to 51 consultations/1000 population during the first month following implementation (P <0.01). However, the on-going effect was not significant (P =0.69).ConclusionsOur research brings mixed findings on the effectiveness of user fee subsidisation as a strategy to increase the utilisation of services. Future work should focus on feasibility issues associated with the removal or reduction of user fees and how to sustain its effects on utilisation in the longer term.

Health services for women, children and adolescents in conflict affected settings: experience from North and South Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo

“…In a country with 64% of the population under the poverty line, user fees represent an important barrier to health service utilization. Their removal, combined with other interventions to improve quality of care, is likely to have some short term benefits [49]. At the same time, as user fees are a major source of funding for health workers' incentives, schemes proposing their abolition need to be implemented with caution to avoid further informalization of health care [50].…”

Quasi-experimental study designs series—paper 5: a checklist for classifying studies evaluating the effects on health interventions—a taxonomy without labels

“…If applicable, the analysis should take into account the data hierarchy. Before after study (BA) As for CBA but without data for a control group of clusters [52] . An uncontrolled comparison is made between frequencies of outcomes for the two time points.…”

Exploring the Dimensions Using Exploratory Factor Analysis of Disruptive Factors and Inventory Control

“…Therefore, hospitals purchase and hold priciest therapeutic inventory items to congregate potential future transactions by ensuring its availability (Hashmi, Amirah, & Yusof, 2020b). Whereas, stocked-out affects healthcare services (Maini et al, 2014). accessories of worth 5.6 billion PKR only for PIC, which was a huge amount (Rashid & Amirah, 2017).…”