2009
DOI: 10.1002/fld.1998
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PID adaptive control of incremental and arclength continuation in nonlinear applications

Abstract: SUMMARYA proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control approach is developed, implemented and investigated numerically in conjunction with continuation techniques for nonlinear problems. The associated algorithm uses PID control to adapt parameter stepsize for branch-following strategies such as those applicable to turning point and bifurcation problems. As representative continuation strategies, incremental Newton, Euler-Newton and pseudo-arclength continuation techniques are considered. Supporting numerical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, practical computations are very often performed with adaptive time step control. In [50,51] adaptive time step control is regarded as a feedback control problem, where the CFL condition (CFL = min e u h t h e ) is kept within an input range, typically for transient problems, 0.5 ≤ CFL ≤ 5. Thus, if we express the time step as a function of CFL and substitute it into Eq.…”
Section: Residual Based Variational Multiscale Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, practical computations are very often performed with adaptive time step control. In [50,51] adaptive time step control is regarded as a feedback control problem, where the CFL condition (CFL = min e u h t h e ) is kept within an input range, typically for transient problems, 0.5 ≤ CFL ≤ 5. Thus, if we express the time step as a function of CFL and substitute it into Eq.…”
Section: Residual Based Variational Multiscale Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider here two different simulations with RB-VMS-VOF. The first simulation with a fixed time step of 10 −3 s, and in the other simulation we consider the time step adapted by the PID feedback control algorithm given in [50] and [51]. The PID controller is set to adapt the time step to the CFL range of 0.5-1.5.…”
Section: Wave Impact On a Containermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess the influence of the system parameters (γ,λ S ,ψ,κ 0 ) on the average steady-state penetration rate, the shooting procedure has been embedded in an arclength-parameterized continuation one [37][38][39]. This predictor/corrector-based procedure allows the computation of solution branches upon variation of one parameter of the governing equations.…”
Section: Limit-cycling Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the use of adaptive timestep control presents some advantages. In [73,74], adaptive time-step control is regarded as a feedback control problem, where the CFL condition is kept within an input range (see Sect. 3.4).…”
Section: Weak Formulation For Incompressible Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%