“…The relationships among the SM parameters are mostly complex and nonlinear [5,[12][13][14][15]. Researchers have suggested artificial intelligence (AI)-based nonlinear modeling techniques, such as proportional plus integral plus derivative [16], pulse width modulation [17][18][19][20], fuzzy logic [2,3], Kalman filter-based methods [7,15,21], artificial neural networks (ANNs) [22,23], particle swarm optimization (in real-time applications) [24], intuitive k-nearest neighbor (k-NN) estimator and genetic algorithm (GA) [5,25], and adaptive ANNs [4] for modeling the parameters and/or predicting the excitation current of SMs and permanent magnet synchronous machines. The modeling of SM parameters using modern AI-based methods for excitation current estimation was realized in recently published studies [4,5,17].…”