2012
DOI: 10.3182/20120328-3-it-3014.00062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PID Controller Design for MIMO Systems by Applying Balanced Truncation to Integral-Type Optimal Servomechanism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Ref. 8 (Proportional-Integral-Derivative) optimal servomechanism has been derived by using a controller order reduction (or closed-loop balanced truncation) technique. This design method is based on linear quadratic regulator (LQR) theory and fractional balanced reduction (FBR) technique 10 .…”
Section: Figure 1 Prototype Qtw-uavmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Ref. 8 (Proportional-Integral-Derivative) optimal servomechanism has been derived by using a controller order reduction (or closed-loop balanced truncation) technique. This design method is based on linear quadratic regulator (LQR) theory and fractional balanced reduction (FBR) technique 10 .…”
Section: Figure 1 Prototype Qtw-uavmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the MATLAB identification toolbox, a linearized model of the boiling process has been obtained around the normal operation point [3]: fuel flow 35.21%, water flow 57.57 %, load level 46.36 %, steam pressure 60 %, oxygen level 50 %, and water level 50 %. The obtained continuous model is the transfer matrix relating the controlled variables to manipulated variables, which is given by (1), where the oxygen level is not shown because it will not be taken account in the design.…”
Section: The Control Structure Design For a Benchmark Boilermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be seen that in this control structure, the steam pressure and the water level changed obviously under the load disturbance, especially when the steam pressure changed, the water level changed more dramatic. The primary cause is that the decentralized control structure does not consider the coupling in the system, so a variety of multivariable PID control strategy are constantly emerging, such as [3] considered applying balanced truncation to integral-type optimal servomechanism; [4] proposed an inverted decoupling method; [5] introduced a method based on H loop-shaping approach; [6] adopted a multivariable decoupling control. The above methods can provide good performance, but the structure and calculation are complex, and lack of generality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, new multivariable PID design methods are interesting for the process industry. This design can be approached from state space methods that usually try to minimize a H∞ norm as performance measure (Ochi & Yokoyama, 2012;Saeki, 2006;Zheng, Wang, & Lee, 2002). However, these procedures mainly involve delay-free systems, and many industrial processes contain time delays (Zhang et al, 2006).…”
Section: H(s)=g(s)·k(s)·[i + G(s)·k(s)]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(63) Figure 12 shows the closed loop system response of the proposed controller in comparison with those obtained with the reference decentralized PI controller in (Morilla, 2012) and the multivariable PI control in (Ochi & Yokoyama, 2012). There is a unit step change in the first reference at t= 0 s, and at t=1000 s, in the second one.…”
Section: Example 2: Boiler Processmentioning
confidence: 99%