1998
DOI: 10.1049/ip-cta:19982243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PID tuning for unstable processes based on gain and phase-margin specifications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
65
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…(28) and (29) along with Eqs. (27a) and (27b) can be solved for the controller parameters k d andk τ d .…”
Section: Design For Processes Of Typementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(28) and (29) along with Eqs. (27a) and (27b) can be solved for the controller parameters k d andk τ d .…”
Section: Design For Processes Of Typementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, to make the solution simple, the trigonometric term (tan) in Eq. (17) is approximated as [28] tan…”
Section: Controller Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…이 후 Venkatashankar와 Chidambaram [6] 이 De Paor과 O'Malley 방법에서 필요한 수치 해석적 방법 대신 근사적 해법을 이용해 P 제어기 와 PI 제어기를 제안하였고, Poulin과 Pomerleau [7] 는 최대 피크 공진에 기초하여 PI 제어기와 PID 제어기를 제안하였다. Ho와 Xu [8] 는 특정한 이득 여유와 위상여유를 만족하도록 하는 PI 제어기를 제안하였으며, 폐루프 시스템이 나이퀴스트(Nyquist) 안정도 조건을 만족시킴을 보여주었다.…”
Section: 서 론unclassified
“…Table 5 presents a stability robustness comparison with other existing PID tuning methods. In particular, the tuning methods presented in Sections 4 and 5 are compared with the R&L method with λ=2.2 (Rotstein & Lewin, 1991), the P&M method (De Paor and O'Malley, 1989), the H&X method with specifications A m =1.3 and φ m =10 o (Ho & Xu, 1998), the P&P method based on the ITAE criterion (Poulin & Pomerleau, 1997) and the J&C method based on the IMC tuning rule with λ=2.5 (Jacob & Chidambaram, 1996), in the special case where d=0.5 and τ S =1. Table 5 show that the DPC method provides more robust controllers than most other methods (except the J&C method with λ=2.5, that gives a significantly slower response in both set point tracking and regulatory control).…”
Section: Controller Tuning Based On Closed-loop Time-response Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%