2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Piecemeal recruitment of left-lateralized brain areas during reading: A spatio-functional account

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

15
42
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
15
42
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In Levy et al (2008), pseudoword reading yielded greater activation in a left parietal region close to our pseudoword-specific cluster in the same region, and in the left occipito-temporal area, in agreement with our findings. Seghier et al (2008) reported a negative correlation between pseudoword reading performance and activation in a network involving the left posterior occipitotemporal region and bilateral intraparietal cortex, suggesting that an ineffective pseudoword reading strategy would increase the processing load on such areas.…”
Section: Pseudoword-related Networksupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In Levy et al (2008), pseudoword reading yielded greater activation in a left parietal region close to our pseudoword-specific cluster in the same region, and in the left occipito-temporal area, in agreement with our findings. Seghier et al (2008) reported a negative correlation between pseudoword reading performance and activation in a network involving the left posterior occipitotemporal region and bilateral intraparietal cortex, suggesting that an ineffective pseudoword reading strategy would increase the processing load on such areas.…”
Section: Pseudoword-related Networksupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This finding was confirmed in Carreiras, Riba, Vergara, Heldmann, and Münte (2009), where activation in frontal regions (specifically, left pre/SMA and inferior frontal gyrus/insula bilaterally) was negatively correlated with word frequency for a lexical decision task. In Levy et al (2008) a precentral gyrus focus close to our left frontal operculum cluster was activated for the comparison pseudowords > words, which contributes to a difficulty effect (as acknowledged in this particular study, too, as pseudowords are the type of stimulus involving the greatest processing load). Also Kronbichler et al (2009) reported foci in the inferior frontal gyri and left precentral gyrus for pseudoword (letter-deviant versions of real words) reading as opposed to word reading.…”
Section: Difficulty-modulated Networkmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The VWFA in the fusiform region displays several high-level features specifically associated with reading, such as invariance for case or font (Dehaene et al, 2001;Binder et al, 2006;Vinckier et al, 2007;Levy et al, 2008;Glezer et al, 2009;Qiao et al, 2010). However, words traverse all stages of the visual system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gaillard et al, 2009). Importantly, using singlewords for probing consciousness can be particularly suitable in the case of partial consciousness due to the graded organization of words from partial (letters) to full (whole word) processing (Selfridge, 1959;McClelland and Rumelhart, 1981) which is mapped onto separate localized functional cerebral clusters (Levy et al, 2008;Mainy et al, 2008;Vidal et al, 2012). Namely, the two perceptual levels involved in word reading (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%