2016
DOI: 10.1109/tip.2016.2571065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Piecewise Mapping in HEVC Lossless Intra-Prediction Coding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The modes in SEAP are implemented in all prediction unit (PU) sizes available in the quadtree-based coding structure, with a maximum CU size of 64×64 and minimum PU size of 4×4. 13 P x,y = b 7 P x,y = (3 * a + b) >>2 14 P x,y = (7 * b + c)>>3 8 P x,y = (5 * a + 3*b) >>3 15 P x,y = (3 * b + c)>>2 9 P x,y = (a +b) >>1 16 P x,y = (5 * b + 3 * c)>>3 10 P x,y = (3*a + 5*b) >>3 17 P x,y = (b + c)>>1 11 P x,y = (a + 3 * b) >>2 18 Our previous work in [7] has shown that among several DPCM-based methods, SAP-E and SAP+SWP2+DTM attain the best lossless coding performance for a variety of SC and camera-captured sequences compared to current intraprediction and RDPCM, which is the DPCM-based method standardized in HEVC. Therefore, the first set of evaluation results (Section IV.A) compares SEAP, SAP-E, and SAP+SWP2+DTM with RDPCM.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The modes in SEAP are implemented in all prediction unit (PU) sizes available in the quadtree-based coding structure, with a maximum CU size of 64×64 and minimum PU size of 4×4. 13 P x,y = b 7 P x,y = (3 * a + b) >>2 14 P x,y = (7 * b + c)>>3 8 P x,y = (5 * a + 3*b) >>3 15 P x,y = (3 * b + c)>>2 9 P x,y = (a +b) >>1 16 P x,y = (5 * b + 3 * c)>>3 10 P x,y = (3*a + 5*b) >>3 17 P x,y = (b + c)>>1 11 P x,y = (a + 3 * b) >>2 18 Our previous work in [7] has shown that among several DPCM-based methods, SAP-E and SAP+SWP2+DTM attain the best lossless coding performance for a variety of SC and camera-captured sequences compared to current intraprediction and RDPCM, which is the DPCM-based method standardized in HEVC. Therefore, the first set of evaluation results (Section IV.A) compares SEAP, SAP-E, and SAP+SWP2+DTM with RDPCM.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Although RDCPM is less effective with repeated patterns than IBC, this tool is capable of outperforming IBC for lossless coding of camera-captured material where repeated patterns are not common [4,7]. It is also important to note that RDCPM improves coding efficiency without a considerable increase in encoding times, compared to the encoding times required by IBC [7,9]. This is done by employing simple sample-wise operations to shorten the prediction distance along the same direction as the blockwise intra-prediction.…”
Section: Scc Tools In Hevcmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations