1997
DOI: 10.1007/s003659900077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Piecewise Monotone Pointwise Approximation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For q=1, Propositions A(k, r, s, q) and J(k, r, s, q) are equivalent; the same is true for Propositions A(k, r, s, q, Y ) and J(k, r, s, q, Y ). This follows by Newman [10], Iliev [6], Beatson and Leviatan [1], Shvedov [13], and Dzyubenko et al [4], [5].…”
Section: Jackson-type Propositionssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…For q=1, Propositions A(k, r, s, q) and J(k, r, s, q) are equivalent; the same is true for Propositions A(k, r, s, q, Y ) and J(k, r, s, q, Y ). This follows by Newman [10], Iliev [6], Beatson and Leviatan [1], Shvedov [13], and Dzyubenko et al [4], [5].…”
Section: Jackson-type Propositionssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…We begin by quoting some results from [7] (see Lemma 5.3 there and the definitions above it). We put b :=max(6s, 8k&s+1), and for each j such that I j & O=< (which we denote by j # H), we let the polynomials T j (x)=T j, n (x; b; Y ) and T j (x) :=T j, n (x; b; Y ) of degree (b+1)(4n&2)+s+2 be those defined there.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let x &1 :=1, x n+1 := &1 and for each j=0, ..., n, set x j :=x j, n := cos( j?Ân), I j :=I j, n :=[x j , x j&1 ], and h j :=h j, n := |I j | :=x j&1 &x j . For later reference we need the following well known relations (see, e.g., [7]) \ n (x)<h j <5\ n (x),…”
Section: âN+1ânmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. ; c 5 and C 0 ; when we have a reason to keep track of them in the computations that we have to carry out in the proofs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%